Osteomyelitis of the Lower Limb: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT versus MRI

被引:13
|
作者
Foti, Giovanni [1 ]
Longo, Chiara [1 ]
Sorgato, Claudia [2 ]
Oliboni, Eugenio Simone [1 ]
Mazzi, Cristina [3 ]
Motta, Leonardo [4 ]
Bertoli, Giulia [4 ]
Marocco, Stefania [4 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Radiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[2] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Diabetol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Clin Res Unit, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[4] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Infect Trop Dis & Microbiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
关键词
chronic pain; osteomyelitis; MRI; dual-energy CT; bone marrow edema; BONE-MARROW EDEMA; IMAGING TESTS; FOOT; IDENTIFICATION; PITFALLS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13040703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: MRI is the preferred imaging technique for the identification of osteomyelitis. The key element for diagnosis is the presence of bone marrow edema (BME). Dual-energy CT (DECT) is an alternative tool which is able to identify BME in the lower limb. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of DECT and MRI for osteomyelitis, using clinical, microbiological, and imaging data as reference standards. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive patients with suspected bone infections undergoing DECT and MRI imaging from December 2020 to June 2022. Four blinded radiologists with various experience levels (range of 3-21 years) evaluated the imaging findings. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in the presence of BMEs, abscesses, sinus tracts, bone reabsorption, or gaseous elements. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of each method were determined and compared using a multi-reader multi-case analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 44 study participants (mean age 62.5 years +/- 16.5 [SD], 32 men) were evaluated. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in 32 participants. For the MRI, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 89.1% and 87.5%, while for the DECT they were 89.0% and 72.9%, respectively. The DECT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.88), compared with the MRI (AUC = 0.92) (p = 0.12). When considering each imaging finding alone, the best accuracy was achieved by considering BME (AUC for DECT 0.85 versus AUC of MRI of 0.93, with p = 0.07), followed by the presence of bone erosions (AUC 0.77 for DECT and 0.53 for MRI, with p = 0.02). The inter-reader agreement of the DECT (k = 88) was similar to that of the MRI (k = 90). Conclusion: Dual-energy CT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance in detecting osteomyelitis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhange Yu
    Tianli Mao
    Yaping Xu
    Tengqi Li
    Yanhua Wang
    Fuqiang Gao
    Wei Sun
    Skeletal Radiology, 2018, 47 : 1587 - 1593
  • [22] Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT in detecting bone marrow edema in lower limb joint injuries: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Yong
    Huang, Kai
    Guo, Qiaofeng
    Hou, Hongtao
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 114
  • [23] Comparison of preoperative diagnostic performance between dual-energy CT, conventional CT, and MRI in endometrial cancer
    Yoshida, Miki
    Saida, Tsukasa
    Mori, Kensaku
    Hoshiai, Sodai
    Sakai, Masafumi
    Amano, Taishi
    Shibuki, Saki
    Miyata, Mariko
    Sato, Toyomi
    Nakajima, Takahito
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 89 : e358 - e367
  • [24] MRI versus Dual-Energy CT in Local-Regional Staging of Gastric Cancer
    Li, Qiong
    Xu, Wei-Yue
    Sun, Na-Na
    Feng, Qiu-Xia
    Zhu, Zhen-Ning
    Hou, Ya-Jun
    Sang, Zi-Tong
    Li, Feng-Yuan
    Li, Bo-Wen
    Xu, Hao
    Liu, Xi-Sheng
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (01)
  • [25] Diagnostic Performance of Dual-energy CT Versus Ultrasonography in Gout: A Meta-analysis
    Shang, Jin
    Zhou, Lu-Ping
    Wang, Huang
    Liu, Bin
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 56 - 68
  • [26] Comment on " Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT in detecting bone marrow edema in lower limb joint injuries: A meta-analysis"
    Shabil, Muhammed
    Bushi, Ganesh
    Sah, Sanjit
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 116
  • [27] Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia-influence on diagnostic accuracy and reader confidence
    Oberparleiter, Moritz
    Vosshenrich, Jan
    Breit, Hanns-Christian
    Kaiser, Philippe
    Hehenkamp, Paul
    Harder, Dorothee
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Zech, Christoph J.
    Obmann, Markus M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (03) : 1405 - 1414
  • [28] Spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine: diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT vs MRI
    Foti, Giovanni
    Longo, Chiara
    Oliboni, Eugenio
    Faccioli, Niccolo
    Sanfilippo, Lorenza
    Guerriero, Massimo
    Augelli, Raffaele
    Motta, Leonardo
    Marocco, Stefania
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (03) : 1647 - 1657
  • [29] Dual-Energy CT Iodine Accuracy Across Vendors and Platforms
    Jacobsen, M.
    Wood, C.
    Cody, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3835 - 3836
  • [30] The diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and SPECT. Is dual-energy CT truly superior to SPECT in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism?
    Kosuda, S.
    Kawana, A.
    Kyoto, Y.
    Naoi, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S386 - S386