Osteomyelitis of the Lower Limb: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT versus MRI

被引:13
|
作者
Foti, Giovanni [1 ]
Longo, Chiara [1 ]
Sorgato, Claudia [2 ]
Oliboni, Eugenio Simone [1 ]
Mazzi, Cristina [3 ]
Motta, Leonardo [4 ]
Bertoli, Giulia [4 ]
Marocco, Stefania [4 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Radiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[2] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Diabetol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Clin Res Unit, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[4] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Infect Trop Dis & Microbiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
关键词
chronic pain; osteomyelitis; MRI; dual-energy CT; bone marrow edema; BONE-MARROW EDEMA; IMAGING TESTS; FOOT; IDENTIFICATION; PITFALLS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13040703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: MRI is the preferred imaging technique for the identification of osteomyelitis. The key element for diagnosis is the presence of bone marrow edema (BME). Dual-energy CT (DECT) is an alternative tool which is able to identify BME in the lower limb. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of DECT and MRI for osteomyelitis, using clinical, microbiological, and imaging data as reference standards. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive patients with suspected bone infections undergoing DECT and MRI imaging from December 2020 to June 2022. Four blinded radiologists with various experience levels (range of 3-21 years) evaluated the imaging findings. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in the presence of BMEs, abscesses, sinus tracts, bone reabsorption, or gaseous elements. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of each method were determined and compared using a multi-reader multi-case analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 44 study participants (mean age 62.5 years +/- 16.5 [SD], 32 men) were evaluated. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in 32 participants. For the MRI, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 89.1% and 87.5%, while for the DECT they were 89.0% and 72.9%, respectively. The DECT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.88), compared with the MRI (AUC = 0.92) (p = 0.12). When considering each imaging finding alone, the best accuracy was achieved by considering BME (AUC for DECT 0.85 versus AUC of MRI of 0.93, with p = 0.07), followed by the presence of bone erosions (AUC 0.77 for DECT and 0.53 for MRI, with p = 0.02). The inter-reader agreement of the DECT (k = 88) was similar to that of the MRI (k = 90). Conclusion: Dual-energy CT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance in detecting osteomyelitis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving diagnostic accuracy for arteries of lower extremities with dual-energy spectral CT imaging
    Jia, Xiaoqian
    Li, Xianjun
    Li, Jianying
    Tian, Qian
    Yao, Yue
    Zhu, Shumeng
    Sun, Jingtao
    Li, Yanan
    Zhao, Liang
    Shi, Yilei
    Tong, Wei
    Yang, Jian
    Guo, Jianxin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 128
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CT in the assessment of traumatic bone marrow edema of lower limb and its correlation with MRI
    Yadav, Harsh
    Khanduri, Sachin
    Yadav, Poonam
    Pandey, Sushma
    Yadav, Vivek Kumar
    Khan, Shahla
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2020, 30 (01): : 59 - 63
  • [3] Identification of Achille's Tendon Tears: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT with Respect to MRI
    Foti, Giovanni
    Bortoli, Luca
    Tronu, Matteo
    Montefusco, Sabrina
    Serra, Gerardo
    Filippini, Roberto
    Iacono, Venanzio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
  • [4] Identification of bone marrow edema of the knee: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI
    Giovanni Foti
    William Mantovani
    Niccolò Faccioli
    Giacomo Crivellari
    Luigi Romano
    Claudio Zorzi
    Giovanni Carbognin
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 405 - 413
  • [5] Identification of bone marrow edema of the ankle: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI
    Foti, Giovanni
    Catania, Matteo
    Caia, Simone
    Romano, Luigi
    Beltramello, Alberto
    Zorzi, Claudio
    Carbognin, Giovanni
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (10): : 1028 - 1036
  • [6] Identification of bone marrow edema of the knee: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI
    Foti, Giovanni
    Mantovani, William
    Faccioli, Niccolo
    Crivellari, Giacomo
    Romano, Luigi
    Zorzi, Claudio
    Carbognin, Giovanni
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (03): : 405 - 413
  • [7] Identification of residual–recurrent cholesteatoma in operated ears: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT and MRI
    Giovanni Foti
    Alberto Beltramello
    Giorgio Minerva
    Matteo Catania
    Massimo Guerriero
    Sergio Albanese
    Giovanni Carbognin
    La radiologia medica, 2019, 124 : 478 - 486
  • [8] Identification of bone marrow edema of the ankle: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI
    Giovanni Foti
    Matteo Catania
    Simone Caia
    Luigi Romano
    Alberto Beltramello
    Claudio Zorzi
    Giovanni Carbognin
    La radiologia medica, 2019, 124 : 1028 - 1036
  • [9] Identification of residual-recurrent cholesteatoma in operated ears: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT and MRI
    Foti, Giovanni
    Beltramello, Alberto
    Minerva, Giorgio
    Catania, Matteo
    Guerriero, Massimo
    Albanese, Sergio
    Carbognin, Giovanni
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (06): : 478 - 486
  • [10] Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study
    Bongartz, Tim
    Glazebrook, Katrina N.
    Kavros, Steven J.
    Murthy, Naveen S.
    Merry, Stephen P.
    Franz, Walter B., III
    Michet, Clement J.
    Veetil, Barath M. Akkara
    Davis, John M., III
    Mason, Thomas G., II
    Warrington, Kenneth J.
    Ytterberg, Steven R.
    Matteson, Eric L.
    Crowson, Cynthia S.
    Leng, Shuai
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 (06) : 1072 - 1077