Impact of environmental regulations on the industrial eco-efficiency in China-based on the strong porter hypothesis and the weak porter hypothesis

被引:16
|
作者
Zhong, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Hamzah, Hanny Zurina [1 ]
Yin, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Desheng [3 ]
Cao, Jianhong [1 ,6 ]
Mao, Xiaoming [4 ]
Li, Hong [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Sch Business & Econ, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Pingxiang Univ, Sch Business, Pingxiang 337055, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Sch Foreign Language, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Yuquan Inst, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulations; Industrial eco-efficiency; Sub-sectors; Pollution intensity; Strong Porter hypothesis; Weak Porter hypothesis; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMY; ENERGY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-25410-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important indicator of sustainable development, industrial eco-efficiency (IEE) has aroused growing attention from governments all over the world including China, in recent decades. The Chinese government has introduced numerous environmental regulations; however, the environmental pollution issue does not appear to have been solved. Moreover, although several earlier studies have shown that environmental regulations may promote innovation, there is no consensus on their ultimate effects on IEE. Therefore, this study took a critical look at the connection between environmental regulations and IEE in 36 Chinese sub-sectors from 2009 to 2018. Based on the weak Porter hypothesis (weak PH) and strong Porter hypothesis (strong PH), this paper constructed two panel regression models and conducted group analysis by pollution intensity to check the relationships among environmental regulations, technological innovation, and IEE. It was found that environmental regulations can improve technological innovation and IEE, but these impacts vary across different pollution groups. Specifically, environmental regulations have a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped relationship with technological innovation and IEE. Of the 36 sub-sectors, 26 prove the existence of the Weak PH while 10 verify the Strong PH, indicating that environmental regulations generally advocate technological innovation for most sub-sectors but only promote IEE in a few sub-sectors at present. Finally, differentiated policy implications for environmental regulations and technological innovation are provided for decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:44490 / 44504
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of environmental regulations on the industrial eco-efficiency in China—based on the strong porter hypothesis and the weak porter hypothesis
    Cheng Zhong
    Hanny Zurina Hamzah
    Jin Yin
    Desheng Wu
    Jianhong Cao
    Xiaoming Mao
    Hong Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 44490 - 44504
  • [2] Can environmental regulation promote industrial innovation and productivity?Based on the strong and weak Porter hypothesis
    Baolong Yuan
    Kun Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2017, (04) : 322 - 336
  • [3] ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY VS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS IN CHINA BASED ON DEA MALMQUIST MODEL AND PORTER HYPOTHESIS
    Zhang, X.
    Yue, L.
    Chang, Y.
    Wu, Z.
    Muhammad, A. A.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (06): : 7519 - 7534
  • [4] Assessment of Technology vs Environmental Regulations in China Based on DEA Malmquist Model and Porter Hypothesis
    Yue, Li-ping
    Yuan, Rui
    Shi, Mei-ni
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT (ICSSD 2017), 2017, : 88 - 91
  • [5] Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis
    Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan
    He, Qile
    Black, Andrew
    Ghobadian, Abby
    Gallear, David
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 155 : 79 - 92
  • [6] Environmental regulation and eco-innovation: the Porter hypothesis refined
    Bitat, Abdelfeteh
    EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 8 (03) : 299 - 321
  • [7] Environmental regulation and eco-innovation: the Porter hypothesis refined
    Abdelfeteh Bitat
    Eurasian Business Review, 2018, 8 : 299 - 321
  • [8] Environmental Efficiency Policies Related to Porter's Hypothesis
    Muryani
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION (ICOI 2017), 2017, 131 : 25 - 31
  • [9] Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry
    Thomas Broberg
    Per-Olov Marklund
    Eva Samakovlis
    Henrik Hammar
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 40 : 43 - 56
  • [10] Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry
    Broberg, Thomas
    Marklund, Per-Olov
    Samakovlis, Eva
    Hammar, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (01) : 43 - 56