Can environmental regulation promote industrial innovation and productivity?Based on the strong and weak Porter hypothesis

被引:5
作者
Baolong Yuan
Kun Zhang
机构
[1] SchoolofBusiness,CentralSouthUniversityofForestryandTechnology
关键词
Environmental regulation; substantial innovation; strategic innovation; productivity; Porter hypothesis; CDM model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F273.1 [企业技术管理]; F424 [工业建设与发展]; X322 [部门环境规划与管理];
学科分类号
1202 ; 120202 ; 020205 ; 0202 ; 083305 ;
摘要
This paper constructed extended CDM model to study the effects of environmental regulation on industrial innovation and productivity based on the perspective of strong and weak "Porter hypothesis",by using 28 manufacturing industry panel data of 2003-2014. The findings reveal that:(1) the impact of environmental regulation on R&D intensity lags behind. In the long run,environmental regulation intensity has a significant role in promoting R&D investment in manufacturing industry.(2) The R&D has a significant role in promoting the substantial innovation of manufacturing industry, and has a strong lag and continuity. However, the R&D intensity has no obvious effect on strategic innovation of manufacturing industry.(3) The substantial innovation doesn't significantly promote the economic performance of manufacturing industry, but it has a significant role in promoting the energy performance of manufacturing industry, and the substantial innovation plays a significant role in promoting environmental performance in the long term. The strategic innovation significantly promotes the economic performance of manufacturing industry, and it inhibits the energy performance and has no significant effect on environmental performance in the short term. It can promote the energy performance of manufacturing industry, but significantly inhibit environmental performance in the long term.(4) Environmental regulation has significantly suppressed the substantive innovation and strategic innovation of manufacturing industry, and the weak Porter hypothesis has not yet been supported. In the short term, environmental regulation inhibits manufacturing economic performance, but it can promote energy and environmental performance. In the long run, environmental regulation promotes the economic and energy performance of manufacturing industry, but it inhibits environmental performance. The establishment of strong Porter hypothesis has a certain scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 336
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   环境规制、引致创新与中国工业绿色生产率提升 [J].
谢荣辉 .
产业经济研究, 2017, (02) :38-48
[2]   环境规制、技术创新与经营绩效——基于37个工业行业的实证分析 [J].
余伟 ;
陈强 ;
陈华 .
科研管理, 2017, 38 (02) :18-25
[3]   不同类型环境规制对企业技术创新影响比较研究 [J].
张平 ;
张鹏鹏 ;
蔡国庆 .
中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26 (04) :8-13
[4]   环境规制强度、行业异质性与R&D效率——源自中国污染密集型与清洁生产型行业的实证比较 [J].
王锋正 ;
郭晓川 .
研究与发展管理, 2016, 28 (01) :103-111
[5]   环境规制强度对污染密集行业绿色技术创新的影响研究——基于2003—2010年面板数据的实证检验 [J].
李婉红 ;
毕克新 ;
孙冰 .
研究与发展管理, 2013, 25 (06) :72-81
[6]  
Environmental policy design; innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation.[J].Nick Johnstone;Shunsuke Managi;Miguel Cárdenas Rodríguez;Ivan Ha??i?;Hidemichi Fujii;Martin Souchier.Energy Economics.2017,
[7]  
How energy technology innovation affects transition of coal resource-based economy in China.[J].Pibin Guo;Ting Wang;Dan Li;Xijun Zhou.Energy Policy.2016,
[8]   The impact of the timing of patents on innovation performance [J].
Kim, Bongsun ;
Kim, Eonsoo ;
Miller, Douglas J. ;
Mahoney, Joseph T. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :914-928
[9]   The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies [J].
Frank, Alejandro German ;
Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira ;
Duarte Ribeiro, Jose Luis ;
de Oliveira, Lindomar Subtil .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (03) :577-592
[10]  
Corporate governance; environmental regulations; and technological change.[J].Suphi Sen.European Economic Review.2015,