Impact of environmental regulations on the industrial eco-efficiency in China-based on the strong porter hypothesis and the weak porter hypothesis

被引:16
|
作者
Zhong, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Hamzah, Hanny Zurina [1 ]
Yin, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Desheng [3 ]
Cao, Jianhong [1 ,6 ]
Mao, Xiaoming [4 ]
Li, Hong [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Sch Business & Econ, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Pingxiang Univ, Sch Business, Pingxiang 337055, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Sch Foreign Language, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Yuquan Inst, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulations; Industrial eco-efficiency; Sub-sectors; Pollution intensity; Strong Porter hypothesis; Weak Porter hypothesis; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMY; ENERGY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-25410-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important indicator of sustainable development, industrial eco-efficiency (IEE) has aroused growing attention from governments all over the world including China, in recent decades. The Chinese government has introduced numerous environmental regulations; however, the environmental pollution issue does not appear to have been solved. Moreover, although several earlier studies have shown that environmental regulations may promote innovation, there is no consensus on their ultimate effects on IEE. Therefore, this study took a critical look at the connection between environmental regulations and IEE in 36 Chinese sub-sectors from 2009 to 2018. Based on the weak Porter hypothesis (weak PH) and strong Porter hypothesis (strong PH), this paper constructed two panel regression models and conducted group analysis by pollution intensity to check the relationships among environmental regulations, technological innovation, and IEE. It was found that environmental regulations can improve technological innovation and IEE, but these impacts vary across different pollution groups. Specifically, environmental regulations have a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped relationship with technological innovation and IEE. Of the 36 sub-sectors, 26 prove the existence of the Weak PH while 10 verify the Strong PH, indicating that environmental regulations generally advocate technological innovation for most sub-sectors but only promote IEE in a few sub-sectors at present. Finally, differentiated policy implications for environmental regulations and technological innovation are provided for decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:44490 / 44504
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HOW ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AFFECTS THE DEVELOPMENT QUALITY OF LOGISTICS INDUSTRY-BASED ON THE TEST OF THE STRONG PORTER HYPOTHESIS
    Zhong, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2022, 23 (05): : 2257 - 2267
  • [22] The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm and Country Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis of the Porter Hypothesis
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Tubb, Adeline
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2018, 5 (02) : 371 - 399
  • [23] The extension of the Porter hypothesis: Can the role of environmental regulation on economic development be affected by other dimensional regulations?
    Mi Zefeng
    Zeng Gang
    Xin Xiaorui
    Shang Yongmin
    Hai Junjiao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 933 - 942
  • [24] How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis
    Ford, Jerad A.
    Steen, John
    Verreynne, Martie-Louise
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 84 : 204 - 213
  • [26] Environmental regulation and green total factor productivity in China: A perspective of Porter's and Compliance Hypothesis
    Luo, Yusen
    Nyarko Mensah, Claudia
    Lu, Zhengnan
    Wu, Chao
    Ecological Indicators, 2022, 145
  • [27] Environmental regulation and green total factor productivity in China: A perspective of Porter's and Compliance Hypothesis
    Luo, Yusen
    Mensah, Claudia Nyarko
    Lu, Zhengnan
    Wu, Chao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 145
  • [28] Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors
    Wang, Yun
    Sun, Xiaohua
    Guo, Xu
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 : 611 - 619
  • [29] The Boundary of Porter Hypothesis: The Energy and Economic Impact of China's Carbon Neutrality Target in 2060
    Huang, Shenhai
    Du, Chao
    Jin, Xian
    Zhang, Daini
    Wen, Shiyan
    Wang, Yu'an
    Cheng, Zhenyu
    Jia, Zhijie
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [30] A study on the impact of the carbon emissions trading policy on the mining industry based on Porter hypothesis
    Zhang, Yaxin
    Zeng, Shibo
    Wu, Qiaosheng
    Fu, Junyi
    Li, Tongping
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 87