Impact of environmental regulations on the industrial eco-efficiency in China-based on the strong porter hypothesis and the weak porter hypothesis

被引:16
|
作者
Zhong, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Hamzah, Hanny Zurina [1 ]
Yin, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Desheng [3 ]
Cao, Jianhong [1 ,6 ]
Mao, Xiaoming [4 ]
Li, Hong [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Sch Business & Econ, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Pingxiang Univ, Sch Business, Pingxiang 337055, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Sch Foreign Language, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Yuquan Inst, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulations; Industrial eco-efficiency; Sub-sectors; Pollution intensity; Strong Porter hypothesis; Weak Porter hypothesis; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMY; ENERGY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-25410-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important indicator of sustainable development, industrial eco-efficiency (IEE) has aroused growing attention from governments all over the world including China, in recent decades. The Chinese government has introduced numerous environmental regulations; however, the environmental pollution issue does not appear to have been solved. Moreover, although several earlier studies have shown that environmental regulations may promote innovation, there is no consensus on their ultimate effects on IEE. Therefore, this study took a critical look at the connection between environmental regulations and IEE in 36 Chinese sub-sectors from 2009 to 2018. Based on the weak Porter hypothesis (weak PH) and strong Porter hypothesis (strong PH), this paper constructed two panel regression models and conducted group analysis by pollution intensity to check the relationships among environmental regulations, technological innovation, and IEE. It was found that environmental regulations can improve technological innovation and IEE, but these impacts vary across different pollution groups. Specifically, environmental regulations have a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped relationship with technological innovation and IEE. Of the 36 sub-sectors, 26 prove the existence of the Weak PH while 10 verify the Strong PH, indicating that environmental regulations generally advocate technological innovation for most sub-sectors but only promote IEE in a few sub-sectors at present. Finally, differentiated policy implications for environmental regulations and technological innovation are provided for decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:44490 / 44504
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can Environmental Regulation Flexibility Explain the Porter Hypothesis?An Empirical Study Based on the Data of China's Listed Enterprises
    Zhou, Guichuan
    Liu, Wendi
    Zhang, Liming
    She, Kaiwen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [32] Carbon emission trading, carbon efficiency, and the Porter hypothesis: Plant-level evidence from China
    Yu, Yanni
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Liu, Yunxiao
    Zhou, Tao
    ENERGY, 2024, 308
  • [33] Analysis of the relationship between economic growth and industrial pollution in Zaozhuang, China-based on the hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve
    Liu, Xiao-hui
    Wang, Wei-liang
    Lu, Shao-yong
    Wang, Yu-fan
    Ren, Zongming
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (16) : 16349 - 16358
  • [34] Environmental taxes, enterprise innovation, and environmental total factor productivity—effect test based on Porter’s hypothesis
    Hongjun Guan
    Yingxue Zhang
    Aiwu Zhao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 99885 - 99899
  • [35] Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of biocomposites for industrial application
    Korol, Jerzy
    Burchart-Korol, Dorota
    Pichlak, Magdalena
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 : 144 - 152
  • [36] On the Industrial Development of China's Western Region Based on Eco-efficiency
    Zhang Xuemei
    Han Guang
    DYNAMICS OF URBAN AGGLOMERATION IN CHINA: PREFERENCES OF ENERGY-SAVING AND ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY SOCIETY, 2009, : 351 - +
  • [37] The impact of eco-environmental regulation on green energy efficiency in China-Based on spatial economic analysis
    Wu, Mingran
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (04) : 971 - 988
  • [38] Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: Revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons' Paradox in China's iron & steel industry
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Tianyue
    Nathwani, Jatin
    Yang, Fangming
    Shao, Qinglong
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 176
  • [39] Can anti-corruption help realize the "strong" Porter Hypothesis in China? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises
    He, Wenjian
    Chen, Xiaoyang
    Liu, Zhiyong John
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2022, 80
  • [40] Environmental taxes, enterprise innovation, and environmental total factor productivity-effect test based on Porter's hypothesis
    Guan, Hongjun
    Zhang, Yingxue
    Zhao, Aiwu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (44) : 99885 - 99899