Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations

被引:1
|
作者
Zwart, Jacob A. [1 ]
Diaz, Jeremy [1 ]
Hamshaw, Scott [1 ]
Oliver, Samantha [2 ]
Ross, Jesse C. [1 ]
Sleckman, Margaux [1 ]
Appling, Alison P. [1 ]
Corson-Dosch, Hayley [1 ]
Jia, Xiaowei [3 ]
Read, Jordan [1 ,4 ]
Sadler, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Thompson, Theodore [1 ]
Watkins, David [1 ]
White, Elaheh [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Water Mission Area, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Consortium Univ, Advancement Hydrol Sci Inc, Arlington, MA USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
deep learning-artificial neural network; forecast; data assimilation; water temperature; unmonitored catchment; MODEL; PREDICTIONS; HYDROPOWER; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11 & DEG;C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45-1.52 & DEG;C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18-3.27 & DEG;C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18 & DEG;C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WRF-LTNGDA: A lightning data assimilation technique implemented in the WRF model for improving precipitation forecasts
    Giannaros, Theodore M.
    Kotroni, Vassiliki
    Lagouvardos, Konstantinos
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 76 : 54 - 68
  • [32] Model and data reduction for data assimilation: Particle filters employing projected forecasts and data with application to a shallow water model
    Albarakati, Aishah
    Budisic, Marko
    Crocker, Rose
    Glass-Klaiber, Juniper
    Iams, Sarah
    Maclean, John
    Marshall, Noah
    Roberts, Colin
    Van Vleck, Erik S.
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 116 : 194 - 211
  • [33] Deep learning identifies accurate burst locations in water distribution networks
    Zhou, Xiao
    Tang, Zhenheng
    Xu, Weirong
    Meng, Fanlin
    Chu, Xiaowen
    Xin, Kunlun
    Fu, Guangtao
    WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 166
  • [34] Improving short-term sea ice concentration forecasts using deep learning
    Palerme, Cyril
    Lavergne, Thomas
    Rusin, Jozef
    Melsom, Arne
    Brajard, Julien
    Kvanum, Are Frode
    Sorensen, Atle Macdonald
    Bertino, Laurent
    Muller, Malte
    CRYOSPHERE, 2024, 18 (04): : 2161 - 2176
  • [35] A hybrid deep learning and data assimilation method for model error estimation
    Ziyi PENG
    Lili LEI
    ZheMin TAN
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2024, 67 (12) : 3655 - 3670
  • [36] A Novel Deep Learning Approach for Data Assimilation of Complex Hydrological Systems
    Zhang, Jiangjiang
    Cao, Chenglong
    Nan, Tongchao
    Ju, Lei
    Zhou, Hongxiang
    Zeng, Lingzao
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (02)
  • [37] Physics-constrained deep learning for data assimilation of subsurface transport
    Wu, Haiyi
    Qiao, Rui
    ENERGY AND AI, 2021, 3
  • [38] A hybrid deep learning and data assimilation method for model error estimation
    Peng, Ziyi
    Lei, Lili
    Tan, Zhe-Min
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 67 (12) : 3655 - 3670
  • [39] Nonlinear Data Assimilation by Deep Learning Embedded in an Ensemble Kalman Filter
    Tsuyuki, Tadashi
    Tamura, Ryosuke
    JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2022, 100 (03) : 533 - 553
  • [40] Deep Learning for Latent Space Data Assimilation in Subsurface Flow Systems
    Razak, Syamil Mohd
    Jahandideh, Atefeh
    Djuraev, Ulugbek
    Jafarpour, Behnam
    SPE JOURNAL, 2022, 27 (05): : 2820 - 2840