Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations

被引:1
|
作者
Zwart, Jacob A. [1 ]
Diaz, Jeremy [1 ]
Hamshaw, Scott [1 ]
Oliver, Samantha [2 ]
Ross, Jesse C. [1 ]
Sleckman, Margaux [1 ]
Appling, Alison P. [1 ]
Corson-Dosch, Hayley [1 ]
Jia, Xiaowei [3 ]
Read, Jordan [1 ,4 ]
Sadler, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Thompson, Theodore [1 ]
Watkins, David [1 ]
White, Elaheh [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Water Mission Area, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Consortium Univ, Advancement Hydrol Sci Inc, Arlington, MA USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
deep learning-artificial neural network; forecast; data assimilation; water temperature; unmonitored catchment; MODEL; PREDICTIONS; HYDROPOWER; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11 & DEG;C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45-1.52 & DEG;C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18-3.27 & DEG;C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18 & DEG;C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Multi-Model Communication and Data Assimilation for Mitigating Model Error and Improving Forecasts
    Yian Chen
    Samuel N. Stechmann
    Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B, 2019, 40 : 689 - 720
  • [12] Multi-Model Communication and Data Assimilation for Mitigating Model Error and Improving Forecasts
    Yian CHEN
    Samuel N.STECHMANN
    ChineseAnnalsofMathematics,SeriesB, 2019, (05) : 689 - 720
  • [13] Multi-Model Communication and Data Assimilation for Mitigating Model Error and Improving Forecasts
    Chen, Yian
    Stechmann, Samuel N.
    CHINESE ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS SERIES B, 2019, 40 (05) : 689 - 720
  • [14] Latent space data assimilation by using deep learning
    Peyron, Mathis
    Fillion, Anthony
    Gurol, Selime
    Marchais, Victor
    Gratton, Serge
    Boudier, Pierre
    Goret, Gael
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 147 (740) : 3759 - 3777
  • [15] Deep learning-based data fusion for evaluating water dividing coefficients
    Zeng, Xingjie
    Yi, Xi
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 246
  • [16] Medium and short term prediction of water temperature in deep water lake-reservoir based on data assimilation
    Sun B.
    Yang X.
    Bao Z.
    Liu X.
    Liu C.
    Gao X.
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53 (12): : 1445 - 1455
  • [17] Improving and evaluating deep learning models of cellular organization
    Sun, Huangqingbo
    Fu, Xuecong
    Abraham, Serena
    Shen, Jin
    Murphy, Robert F.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 38 (23) : 5299 - 5306
  • [18] Improving Land Data Assimilation Performance with a Water Budget Constraint
    Yilmaz, M. Tugrul
    DelSole, Timothy
    Houser, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (05) : 1040 - 1055
  • [19] Improving Operational Water Quality Forecasting with Ensemble Data Assimilation
    Riazi, Hamideh
    Kim, Sunghee
    Seo, Dong-Jun
    Shin, Changmin
    Kim, Kyunghyun
    JOURNAL OF WATER MANAGEMENT MODELING, 2016, 25
  • [20] Crop model data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman filter for improving regional crop yield forecasts
    de Wit, A. M.
    van Diepen, C. A.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2007, 146 (1-2) : 38 - 56