Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations

被引:1
|
作者
Zwart, Jacob A. [1 ]
Diaz, Jeremy [1 ]
Hamshaw, Scott [1 ]
Oliver, Samantha [2 ]
Ross, Jesse C. [1 ]
Sleckman, Margaux [1 ]
Appling, Alison P. [1 ]
Corson-Dosch, Hayley [1 ]
Jia, Xiaowei [3 ]
Read, Jordan [1 ,4 ]
Sadler, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Thompson, Theodore [1 ]
Watkins, David [1 ]
White, Elaheh [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Water Mission Area, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Consortium Univ, Advancement Hydrol Sci Inc, Arlington, MA USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
deep learning-artificial neural network; forecast; data assimilation; water temperature; unmonitored catchment; MODEL; PREDICTIONS; HYDROPOWER; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11 & DEG;C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45-1.52 & DEG;C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18-3.27 & DEG;C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18 & DEG;C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assimilation of the deep learning-corrected global forecast system fields into the regional model for improving medium-range persistent precipitation forecasts
    Guo, Shuchang
    Yang, Yi
    Liu, Peng
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 303
  • [22] Dynamic Neural Assimilation: a deep learning and data assimilation model for air quality predictions
    Tuckus, Nikodemas
    D'Elia, Ilaria
    Chinnici, Marta
    Arcucci, Rossella
    DISCOVER APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 6 (04)
  • [23] Dynamic Neural Assimilation: a deep learning and data assimilation model for air quality predictions
    Nikodemas Tučkus
    Ilaria D’Elia
    Marta Chinnici
    Rossella Arcucci
    Discover Applied Sciences, 6
  • [24] Air Quality Forecasts Improved by Combining Data Assimilation and Machine Learning With Satellite AOD
    Lee, Seunghee
    Park, Seohui
    Lee, Myong-In
    Kim, Ganghan
    Im, Jungho
    Song, Chang-Keun
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (01)
  • [25] Deep Learning Architecture Reduction for fMRI Data
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, Ruben
    Mendez-Vazquez, Andres
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [26] Application of radar data assimilation on convective precipitation forecasts based on water vapor retrieval
    He, Zhixin
    Wang, Dongyong
    Qiu, Xuexing
    Jiang, Yang
    Li, Huimin
    Shu, Aiqing
    METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2021, 133 (03) : 611 - 629
  • [27] Application of radar data assimilation on convective precipitation forecasts based on water vapor retrieval
    Zhixin He
    Dongyong Wang
    Xuexing Qiu
    Yang Jiang
    Huimin Li
    Aiqing Shu
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2021, 133 : 611 - 629
  • [28] Data Assimilation in Chaotic Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
    Hammoud, Mohamad Abed El Rahman
    Raboudi, Naila
    Titi, Edriss S.
    Knio, Omar
    Hoteit, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [29] SCALEDEEP: A Scalable Compute Architecture for Learning and Evaluating Deep Networks
    Venkataramani, Swagath
    Ranjan, Ashish
    Banerjee, Subarno
    Das, Dipankar
    Avancha, Sasikanth
    Jagannathan, Ashok
    Durg, Ajaya
    Nagaraj, Dheemanth
    Kaul, Bharat
    Dubey, Pradeep
    Raghunathan, Anand
    44TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE (ISCA 2017), 2017, : 13 - 26
  • [30] Improving Deep Learning with Generic Data Augmentation
    Taylor, Luke
    Nitschke, Geoff
    2018 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI), 2018, : 1542 - 1547