Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations

被引:1
|
作者
Zwart, Jacob A. [1 ]
Diaz, Jeremy [1 ]
Hamshaw, Scott [1 ]
Oliver, Samantha [2 ]
Ross, Jesse C. [1 ]
Sleckman, Margaux [1 ]
Appling, Alison P. [1 ]
Corson-Dosch, Hayley [1 ]
Jia, Xiaowei [3 ]
Read, Jordan [1 ,4 ]
Sadler, Jeffrey [1 ,5 ]
Thompson, Theodore [1 ]
Watkins, David [1 ]
White, Elaheh [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Water Mission Area, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Consortium Univ, Advancement Hydrol Sci Inc, Arlington, MA USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
deep learning-artificial neural network; forecast; data assimilation; water temperature; unmonitored catchment; MODEL; PREDICTIONS; HYDROPOWER; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11 & DEG;C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45-1.52 & DEG;C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18-3.27 & DEG;C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18 & DEG;C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water forecasts and data assimilation
    Erichsen, A. C.
    Sorensen, J. V. T.
    Hansen, I. S.
    Moehlenberg, F.
    2008 IEEE/OES US/EU-Baltic International Symposium, 2008, : 26 - 34
  • [2] Deep learning approaches for improving prediction of daily stream temperature in data-scarce, unmonitored, and dammed basins
    Rahmani, Farshid
    Shen, Chaopeng
    Oliver, Samantha
    Lawson, Kathryn
    Appling, Alison
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2021, 35 (11)
  • [3] Near-term forecasts of stream temperature using deep learning and data assimilation in support of management decisions
    Zwart, Jacob A. A.
    Oliver, Samantha K. K.
    Watkins, William David
    Sadler, Jeffrey M. M.
    Appling, Alison P. P.
    Corson-Dosch, Hayley R. R.
    Jia, Xiaowei
    Kumar, Vipin
    Read, Jordan S. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 59 (02): : 317 - 337
  • [4] Deep Data Assimilation: Integrating Deep Learning with Data Assimilation
    Arcucci, Rossella
    Zhu, Jiangcheng
    Hu, Shuang
    Guo, Yi-Ke
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 21
  • [5] Improving estimates and forecasts of lake carbon dynamics using data assimilation
    Zwart, Jacob A.
    Hararuk, Oleksandra
    Prairie, Yves T.
    Jones, Stuart E.
    Solomon, Christopher T.
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS, 2019, 17 (02): : 97 - 111
  • [6] Predicting Water Temperature Dynamics of Unmonitored Lakes With Meta-Transfer Learning
    Willard, Jared D.
    Read, Jordan S.
    Appling, Alison P.
    Oliver, Samantha K.
    Jia, Xiaowei
    Kumar, Vipin
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 57 (07)
  • [7] Deep learning approach for wind speed forecasts at turbine locations in a wind farm
    Kou, Peng
    Wang, Chen
    Liang, Deliang
    Cheng, Song
    Gao, Lin
    IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2020, 14 (13) : 2416 - 2428
  • [8] VERIFICATION OF WATER TEMPERATURE FORECASTS FOR DEEP, STRATIFIED RESERVOIRS
    BURT, WV
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1974, 10 (01) : 93 - 97
  • [9] Data assimilation for urban stormwater and water quality simulations using deep reinforcement learning
    Jeung, Minhyuk
    Jang, Jiyi
    Yoon, Kwangsik
    Baek, Sang-Soo
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 624
  • [10] Assimilation of water temperature and discharge data for ensemble water temperature forecasting
    Ouellet-Proulx, Sebastien
    Chiadjeu, Olivier Chimi
    Boucher, Marie-Amelie
    St-Hilaire, Andre
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 554 : 342 - 359