Noninvasive markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation–Where do we stand?

被引:0
|
作者
Ivana Mikolasevic [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sanja Stojsavljevic [4 ]
Filip Blazic [5 ]
Maja Mijic [6 ]
Delfa Radic-Kristo [7 ,8 ]
Toni Juric [9 ]
Nadija Skenderevic [6 ]
Mia Klapan [9 ]
Andjela Lukic [9 ]
Tajana Filipec Kanizaj [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka
[2] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical hospital Merkur
[3] Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka
[4] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center “Sestre Milosrdnice”
[5] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center Rijeka
[6] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Merkur  7. Department of Hematology, University Hospital Merkur
[7] Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb
[8] School of Medicine, School of Medicine
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
In the last two decades, advances in immunosuppressive regimens have led to fewer complications of acute rejection crisis and consequently improved shortterm graft and patient survival. In parallel with this great success, long-term posttransplantation complications have become a focus of interest of doctors engaged in transplant medicine. Metabolic syndrome(MetS) and its individual components, namely, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, often develop in the post-transplant setting and are associated with immunosuppressive therapy. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) is closely related to MetS and its individual components and is the liver manifestation of MetS. Therefore, it is not surprising that MetS and its individual components are associated with recurrent or "de novo" NAFLD after liver transplantation(LT). Fibrosis of the graft is one of the main determinants of overall morbidity and mortality in the post-LT period. In the assessment of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis, we have biochemical markers, imaging methods and liver biopsy. Because of the significant economic burden of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis and its potential consequences, there is an unmet need for noninvasive methods that are efficient and cost-effective. Biochemical scores can overestimate fibrosis and are not a good method for fibrosis evaluation in liver transplant recipients due to frequent post-LT thrombocytopenia. Transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter is a promising noninvasive method for steatosis and fibrosis. In this review, we will specifically focus on the evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis in the post-LT setting in the context of de novo or recurrent NAFLD.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Sarcopenia: Where Do We Stand?
    Mikolasevic, Ivana
    Pavic, Tajana
    Kanizaj, Tajana Filipec
    Bender, Darija Vranesic
    Domislovic, Viktor
    Krznaric, Zeljko
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [42] Laparoscopic liver resection for living donation: where do we stand?
    Cauchy, Francois
    Schwarz, Lilian
    Scatton, Olivier
    Soubrane, Olivier
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (42) : 15590 - 15598
  • [43] Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Disease: Where Do We Stand?
    Pavic, Tajana
    Mikolasevic, Ivana
    Kralj, Dominik
    Blazevic, Nina
    Skrtic, Anita
    Budimir, Ivan
    Lerotic, Ivan
    Hrabar, Davor
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [44] Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?
    Lafaro, Kelly
    Buettner, Stefan
    Maqsood, Hadia
    Wagner, Doris
    Bagante, Fabio
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Xu, Li
    Kamel, Ihab
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (11) : 2079 - 2092
  • [45] Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Where do we stand?
    Durand, Francois
    Roux, Olivier
    Weiss, Emmanuel
    Francoz, Claire
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 41 : 128 - 136
  • [46] Laparoscopic liver resection for living donation: Where do we stand?
    Fran?ois Cauchy
    Lilian Schwarz
    Olivier Scatton
    Olivier Soubrane
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (42) : 15590 - 15598
  • [47] Neo-adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation:Where do we stand?
    Masato Fujiki
    Federico Aucejo
    Minsig Choi
    Richard Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (18) : 5308 - 5319
  • [48] Neo-adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: Where do we stand?
    Fujiki, Masato
    Aucejo, Federico
    Choi, Minsig
    Kim, Richard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (18) : 5308 - 5319
  • [49] Transplantation tolerance - where do we stand?
    Waldmann, H
    NATURE MEDICINE, 1999, 5 (11) : 1245 - 1248
  • [50] CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION - WHERE DO WE STAND
    HUNT, SA
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (07) : 15 - &