Noninvasive markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation–Where do we stand?

被引:0
|
作者
Ivana Mikolasevic [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sanja Stojsavljevic [4 ]
Filip Blazic [5 ]
Maja Mijic [6 ]
Delfa Radic-Kristo [7 ,8 ]
Toni Juric [9 ]
Nadija Skenderevic [6 ]
Mia Klapan [9 ]
Andjela Lukic [9 ]
Tajana Filipec Kanizaj [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka
[2] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical hospital Merkur
[3] Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka
[4] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center “Sestre Milosrdnice”
[5] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center Rijeka
[6] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Merkur  7. Department of Hematology, University Hospital Merkur
[7] Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb
[8] School of Medicine, School of Medicine
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
In the last two decades, advances in immunosuppressive regimens have led to fewer complications of acute rejection crisis and consequently improved shortterm graft and patient survival. In parallel with this great success, long-term posttransplantation complications have become a focus of interest of doctors engaged in transplant medicine. Metabolic syndrome(MetS) and its individual components, namely, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, often develop in the post-transplant setting and are associated with immunosuppressive therapy. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) is closely related to MetS and its individual components and is the liver manifestation of MetS. Therefore, it is not surprising that MetS and its individual components are associated with recurrent or "de novo" NAFLD after liver transplantation(LT). Fibrosis of the graft is one of the main determinants of overall morbidity and mortality in the post-LT period. In the assessment of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis, we have biochemical markers, imaging methods and liver biopsy. Because of the significant economic burden of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis and its potential consequences, there is an unmet need for noninvasive methods that are efficient and cost-effective. Biochemical scores can overestimate fibrosis and are not a good method for fibrosis evaluation in liver transplant recipients due to frequent post-LT thrombocytopenia. Transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter is a promising noninvasive method for steatosis and fibrosis. In this review, we will specifically focus on the evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis in the post-LT setting in the context of de novo or recurrent NAFLD.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adult to adult living related liver transplantation: Where do we currently stand?
    Erica M Carlisle
    Giuliano Testa
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, (46) : 6729 - 6736
  • [22] Liver transplantation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Europe: Where do we stand?
    Durand, Francois
    Pavesi, Marco
    Cheung, Ramsey
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 71 (02) : 240 - 242
  • [23] Fatty liver and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis - Where do we stand and where are we going?
    Lonardo, A
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1999, 17 (02) : 80 - 89
  • [24] Transient elastography(Fibro Scan~?) with controlled attenuation parameter in the assessment of liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease- Where do we stand?
    Ivana Mikolasevic
    Lidija Orlic
    Neven Franjic
    Goran Hauser
    Davor Stimac
    Sandra Milic
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, (32) : 7236 - 7251
  • [25] Assessment of Liver Function With MRI: Where Do We Stand?
    Rio Bartulos, Carolina
    Senk, Karin
    Schumacher, Mona
    Plath, Jan
    Kaiser, Nico
    Bade, Ragnar
    Woetzel, Jan
    Wiggermann, Philipp
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [26] Living liver donor mortality: Where do we stand?
    Bramstedt, KA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04): : 755 - 759
  • [27] Liver biopsy versus noninvasive testing in chronic hepatitis C: Where do we stand in 2008?
    Aita J.S.
    Harrison S.A.
    Current Hepatitis Reports, 2008, 7 (2) : 51 - 59
  • [28] Tolerance after liver transplantation: Where are we?
    Feng, Sandy
    Bucuvalas, John
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (12) : 1601 - 1614
  • [29] Tolerance After Liver Transplantation: Where Are We?
    Branco, Joana C.
    Morbey, Ana
    Martins, Americo
    Barroso, Eduardo
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (09) : 1303 - 1304
  • [30] Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation in USA: Where Do We Stand, Where to Go
    Elsabbagh, A. M.
    Yoshida, A.
    Fung, J.
    Abouljoud, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 1076 - 1077