Noninvasive markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation–Where do we stand?

被引:0
|
作者
Ivana Mikolasevic [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sanja Stojsavljevic [4 ]
Filip Blazic [5 ]
Maja Mijic [6 ]
Delfa Radic-Kristo [7 ,8 ]
Toni Juric [9 ]
Nadija Skenderevic [6 ]
Mia Klapan [9 ]
Andjela Lukic [9 ]
Tajana Filipec Kanizaj [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka
[2] Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical hospital Merkur
[3] Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka
[4] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center “Sestre Milosrdnice”
[5] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center Rijeka
[6] Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Merkur  7. Department of Hematology, University Hospital Merkur
[7] Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb
[8] School of Medicine, School of Medicine
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R657.3 [肝及肝管];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
In the last two decades, advances in immunosuppressive regimens have led to fewer complications of acute rejection crisis and consequently improved shortterm graft and patient survival. In parallel with this great success, long-term posttransplantation complications have become a focus of interest of doctors engaged in transplant medicine. Metabolic syndrome(MetS) and its individual components, namely, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, often develop in the post-transplant setting and are associated with immunosuppressive therapy. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) is closely related to MetS and its individual components and is the liver manifestation of MetS. Therefore, it is not surprising that MetS and its individual components are associated with recurrent or "de novo" NAFLD after liver transplantation(LT). Fibrosis of the graft is one of the main determinants of overall morbidity and mortality in the post-LT period. In the assessment of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis, we have biochemical markers, imaging methods and liver biopsy. Because of the significant economic burden of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis and its potential consequences, there is an unmet need for noninvasive methods that are efficient and cost-effective. Biochemical scores can overestimate fibrosis and are not a good method for fibrosis evaluation in liver transplant recipients due to frequent post-LT thrombocytopenia. Transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter is a promising noninvasive method for steatosis and fibrosis. In this review, we will specifically focus on the evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis in the post-LT setting in the context of de novo or recurrent NAFLD.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supplementation of amino acids to prevent reperfusion injury after liver surgery and transplantation - Where do we stand today?
    Hoffmann, Katrin
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Schemmer, Peter
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2011, 30 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [32] Impact of Graded Donor Liver Steatosis on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury After Liver Transplantation: Where are We now?
    Boteon, Yuri L.
    Boteon, Amanda P. C. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 11 (01) : 157 - 158
  • [33] Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) in the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Disease: Where do we Stand Today?
    Hande, Pradipta C.
    Hande, Vivek
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 23 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [34] Noninvasive Markers to Assess Liver Fibrosis
    Czul, Frank
    Bhamidimarri, Kalyan R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 50 (06) : 445 - 457
  • [35] Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?
    Kelly Lafaro
    Stefan Buettner
    Hadia Maqsood
    Doris Wagner
    Fabio Bagante
    Gaya Spolverato
    Li Xu
    Ihab Kamel
    Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 2079 - 2092
  • [36] Viscoelastic tests in liver disease: where do we stand now?
    Buliarca, Alina
    Horhat, Adelina
    Mocan, Tudor
    Craciun, Rares
    Procopet, Bogdan
    Sparchez, Zeno
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (23) : 3290 - 3302
  • [37] Viscoelastic tests in liver disease: where do we stand now?
    Alina Buliarca
    Adelina Horhat
    Tudor Mocan
    Rares Craciun
    Bogdan Procopet
    Zeno Sparchez
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, 27 (23) : 3290 - 3302
  • [38] COVID-19 and liver injury: where do we stand?
    Papadopoulos, Nikolaos
    Vasileiadi, Sofia
    Deutsch, Melanie
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 33 (05): : 459 - 464
  • [39] Metabolic fatty liver syndromes: where do we stand in 2024?
    Chan, Wah-Kheong
    George, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 39 (04) : 613 - 614
  • [40] Laparoscopy for Liver Hydatid Disease: Where Do We Stand Today?
    Sharma, Deborshi
    Babu, Raghavendra
    Borgharia, Saurabh
    Baruah, Dhiraj
    Thomas, Shaji
    Kumar, Ajay
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (06): : 419 - 423