Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice

被引:0
|
作者
van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K. [1 ]
Colliers, Annelies [2 ]
Blanker, Marco H. [3 ]
de Bont, Eefje G. P. M. [4 ]
van Driel, Antoinette A. [5 ]
Laan, Bart J. [1 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Venekamp, Roderick P. [6 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Platteel, Tamara N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth,Dept Internal Med Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary & Long Term Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice & Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Author qualitative research; cystitis; general practice; decision making; shared; urinary tract infections; primary health care; primary care nursing; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; WOMEN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0179
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non- antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non- pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. Design & setting: Qualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non- pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients). Method: Individual semi- structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis. Results: Ten GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non- antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non- antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary. Conclusion: SDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long- term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co- created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Practice
    Klein, Lloyd W. W.
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Cigarroa, Joaquin
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2023, 31 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [42] Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (09): : 811 - 812
  • [43] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [44] Putting informed and shared decision making into practice
    Towle, Angela
    Godolphin, William
    Grams, Garry
    LaMarre, Amanda
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2006, 9 (04) : 321 - 332
  • [45] Shared Decision Making: an inclusive model for practice
    Damman, Olga
    Richter, Romy
    Murugesu, Laxsini
    Fransen, Mirjam
    Jansen, Jesse
    Van der Weijden, Trudy
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S6 - S6
  • [46] Operationalizing shared decision making in clinical practice
    Shaker, Marcus S.
    Verdi, Marylee
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2024, 45 (06) : 398 - 403
  • [47] Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice
    Stiggelbout, A. M.
    Pieterse, A. H.
    De Haes, J. C. J. M.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (10) : 1172 - 1179
  • [48] Challenges of shared decision making in advanced lung cancer: a qualitative study for the development of decision aids
    Unsoeld, L.
    Deis, N.
    Siegle, A.
    Thomas, M.
    Villalobos, M.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 44 : 280 - 281
  • [49] Shared decision-making for women facing an unplanned pregnancy: A qualitative study
    Ueno, Yoko
    Kako, Mayumi
    Ohira, Mitsuko
    Okamura, Hitoshi
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 22 (04) : 1186 - 1196
  • [50] Where is Shared Decision Making in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma? A Qualitative Study
    Foulon, Veerle
    Sillis, Laure
    Panis, Laura Int
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Damiaens, Amber
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 9 - 9