Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice

被引:0
|
作者
van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K. [1 ]
Colliers, Annelies [2 ]
Blanker, Marco H. [3 ]
de Bont, Eefje G. P. M. [4 ]
van Driel, Antoinette A. [5 ]
Laan, Bart J. [1 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Venekamp, Roderick P. [6 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Platteel, Tamara N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth,Dept Internal Med Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary & Long Term Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice & Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Author qualitative research; cystitis; general practice; decision making; shared; urinary tract infections; primary health care; primary care nursing; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; WOMEN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0179
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non- antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non- pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. Design & setting: Qualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non- pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients). Method: Individual semi- structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis. Results: Ten GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non- antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non- antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary. Conclusion: SDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long- term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co- created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [22] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, A.
    Steffensen, K. Dahl
    Olling, K.
    Dekker, A.
    Wee, L.
    Roumen, C.
    Hasannejadasl, H.
    Fijten, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S883 - S884
  • [23] What makes a patient ready for Shared Decision Making? A qualitative study
    Keij, Sascha M.
    Van Duijn-Bakker, Nanny
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (03) : 571 - 577
  • [24] Shared decision-making for postoperative analgesia A semistructured qualitative study
    van den Berg, Amalia M. A.
    Stalmeier, Peep F. M.
    Scheffer, Gert Jan
    Hermens, Rosella P.
    Bucx, Martin J. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [25] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    BMC Nursing, 20
  • [26] The Barriers and Facilitators of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Otolaryngology: A Qualitative Study
    Khan, Usman
    Luther, Erin
    Cassidy, Christine E.
    Boss, Emily
    Meister, Kara D.
    Bohm, Lauren
    Graham, M. Elise
    Hong, Paul
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2025, 172 (01) : 273 - 282
  • [27] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Chung, Fen-Fang
    Wang, Pao-Yu
    Lin, Shu-Chuan
    Lee, Yu-Hsia
    Wu, Hon-Yen
    Lin, Mei-Hsiang
    BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [28] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, Anshu
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Olling, Karina
    Dekker, Andre
    Wee, Leonard
    Roumen, Cheryl
    Hasannejadasl, Hajar
    Fijten, Rianne
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [29] Shared Decision Making in Home Hospice Nursing Visits: A Qualitative Study
    Oliver, Debra Parker
    Washington, Karla
    Demiris, George
    Wallace, Audrey
    Propst, Marc R.
    Uraizee, Aisha M.
    Craig, Kevin
    Clayton, Margaret F.
    Reblin, Maija
    Ellington, Lee
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 55 (03) : 922 - 929
  • [30] Qualitative perspectives on shared decision-making from general surgery faculty and trainees
    Melanie Fritz
    Maham Javaid
    Mollie O’Brien
    Suzanne Mitchell
    Sabrina E. Sanchez
    Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 1 (1):