Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice

被引:0
|
作者
van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K. [1 ]
Colliers, Annelies [2 ]
Blanker, Marco H. [3 ]
de Bont, Eefje G. P. M. [4 ]
van Driel, Antoinette A. [5 ]
Laan, Bart J. [1 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Venekamp, Roderick P. [6 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Platteel, Tamara N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth,Dept Internal Med Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary & Long Term Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice & Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Author qualitative research; cystitis; general practice; decision making; shared; urinary tract infections; primary health care; primary care nursing; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; WOMEN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0179
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non- antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non- pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. Design & setting: Qualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non- pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients). Method: Individual semi- structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis. Results: Ten GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non- antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non- antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary. Conclusion: SDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long- term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co- created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perspectives of Clinicians on Shared Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Qualitative Study
    Kerklaan, Jasmijn
    Hanson, Camilla S.
    Carter, Simon
    Tong, Allison
    Sinha, Aditi
    Dart, Allison
    Eddy, Allison A.
    Guha, Chandana
    Gipson, Debbie S.
    Bockenhauer, Detlef
    Hannan, Elyssa
    Yap, Hui-Kim
    Groothoff, Jaap
    Zappitelli, Michael
    Amir, Noa
    Alexander, Stephen I.
    Furth, Susan L.
    Samuel, Susan
    Gutman, Talia
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2022, 80 (02) : 241 - 250
  • [32] What value structure underlies shared decision making? A qualitative synthesis of models of shared decision making
    Oueslati, Roukayya
    Woudstra, Anke J.
    Alkirawan, Rima
    Reis, Ria
    van Zaalen, Yvonne
    Slager, Meralda T.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Touwen, Dorothea P.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 124
  • [33] Needs of parents and professionals to improve shared decision-making in interprofessional maternity care practice: A qualitative study
    Molenaar, Joyce
    Korstjens, Irene
    Hendrix, Marijke
    de Vries, Raymond
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2018, 45 (03): : 245 - 254
  • [34] Shared Decision Making in Antipsychotic Management
    Mistler, Lisa A.
    Drake, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE, 2008, 14 (06) : 333 - 344
  • [35] Vertically integrated shared learning models in general practice: a qualitative study
    Ahern, Christine M.
    van de Mortel, Thea F.
    Silberberg, Peter L.
    Barling, Janet A.
    Pit, Sabrina W.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 14
  • [36] Vertically integrated shared learning models in general practice: a qualitative study
    Christine M Ahern
    Thea F van de Mortel
    Peter L Silberberg
    Janet A Barling
    Sabrina W Pit
    BMC Family Practice, 14
  • [37] Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Evaluation and Management Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice
    Watts, Nelson B.
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (03): : 253 - 254
  • [38] Advance care planning in general practice: promoting patient autonomy and shared decision making
    Hamilton, Ian J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (656): : 104 - +
  • [39] Practice of shared medical decision making in addiction
    Trabut, J. B.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 30 (08) : S40 - S40
  • [40] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Glyn Elwyn
    Dominick Frosch
    Richard Thomson
    Natalie Joseph-Williams
    Amy Lloyd
    Paul Kinnersley
    Emma Cording
    Dave Tomson
    Carole Dodd
    Stephen Rollnick
    Adrian Edwards
    Michael Barry
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012, 27 : 1361 - 1367