High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Prong Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Moderate to Severe Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Maya, Malini [1 ]
Rameshkumar, Ramachandran [1 ,2 ]
Selvan, Tamil [1 ]
Delhikumar, Chinnaiah Govindhareddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
[2] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ & Hlth Sci, Mediclin City Hosp, Dept Pediat, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
bronchiolitis; children; high-flow nasal cannula; mechanical ventilation; nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure; respiratory support; PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; VIRAL BRONCHIOLITIS; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; THERAPY; OXYGEN; CPAP;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000003521
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal prong bubble continuous positive airway pressure (b-CPAP) in children with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Design: A randomized controlled trial was carried out from August 2019 to February 2022. (Clinical Trials Registry of India number CTRI/2019/07/020402). Setting: Pediatric emergency ward and ICU within a tertiary care center in India. Patients: Children 1-23 months old with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Intervention: Comparison of HFNC with b-CPAP, using a primary outcome of treatment failure within 24 hours of randomization, as defined by any of: 1) a 1-point increase in modified Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS) above baseline, 2) a rise in respiratory rate (RR) greater than 10 per minute from baseline, and 3) escalation in respiratory support. The secondary outcomes were success rate after crossover, if any, need for mechanical ventilation (invasive/noninvasive), local skin lesions, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results: In 118 children analyzed by intention-to-treat, HFNC ( n = 59) versus b-CPAP ( n = 59) was associated with a lower failure rate (23.7% vs. 42.4%; relative risk [95% CI], RR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97], p = 0.031). The Cox proportion model confirmed a lower hazard of treatment failure in the HFNC group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.94], p = 0.032). No crossover was noted. A lower proportion escalated to noninvasive ventilation in the HFNC group (15.3%) versus the b-CPAP group (15.3% vs. 39% [RR 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20-0.77)], p = 0.004). The HFNC group had a longer median (interquartile range) duration of oxygen therapy (4 [3-6] vs. 3 [3-5] d; p = 0.012) and hospital stay (6 [5-8.5] vs. 5 [4-7] d, p = 0.021). No significant difference was noted in other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: In children aged one to 23 months with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis, the use of HFNC therapy as opposed to b-CPAP for early respiratory support is associated with a lower failure rate and, secondarily, a lower risk of escalation to mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure therapy in treatment of viral bronchiolitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Signe Vahlkvist
    Louise Jürgensen
    Amalie la Cour
    Simone Markoew
    Thomas Houmann Petersen
    Poul-Erik Kofoed
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2020, 179 : 513 - 518
  • [22] A randomised trial of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with moderate bronchiolitis
    Durand, Philippe
    Guiddir, Tamma
    Kyheng, Christele
    Blanc, Florence
    Vignaud, Olivier
    Epaud, Ralph
    Dugelay, Frederic
    Breant, Isabelle
    Badier, Isabelle
    Degas-Bussiere, Vanessa
    Phan, Florence
    Soussan-Banini, Valerie
    Lehnert, Agnes
    Mbamba, Celestin
    Barrey, Catherine
    Tahiri, Cedric
    Decobert, Marion
    Saunier-Pernaudet, Marie
    Craiu, Irina
    Taveira, Melanie
    Gajdos, Vincent
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56 (01)
  • [23] High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hong, Hui
    Li, Xiao-xia
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Zhi-qun
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (02): : 259 - 266
  • [24] Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Weaning from Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Soonsawad, Sasivimon
    Tongsawang, Numtip
    Nuntnarumit, Pracha
    NEONATOLOGY, 2016, 110 (03) : 204 - 209
  • [25] Observational Study of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Lampland, Andrea L.
    Plumm, Brenda
    Meyers, Patricia A.
    Worwa, Cathy T.
    Mammel, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 154 (02): : 177 - 182
  • [26] Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
    Yokoyama, T.
    Nagata, K.
    Tsugitomi, R.
    Nishimura, N.
    Kondoh, Y.
    Tomii, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [27] Physiologic Basis for Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Heated and Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula, and Nasal Ventilation
    Dysart, Kevin C.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 43 (04) : 621 - +
  • [28] The infant with severe bronchiolitis: from high flow nasal cannula to continuous positive airway pressure and mechanical ventilation
    Wolfler, Andrea
    Raimondi, Gianfranco
    Pagan de Paganis, Cecilia
    Zoia, Elena
    MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2018, 70 (06) : 612 - 622
  • [29] Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. High Flow Nasal Cannula in children with acute severe or moderate bronchiolitis. A systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Catano-Jaramillo, M. L.
    Jaramillo-Bustamante, J. C.
    Florez, I. D.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2022, 46 (02) : 72 - 80
  • [30] High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study)
    Milesi, Christophe
    Essouri, Sandrine
    Pouyau, Robin
    Liet, Jean-Michel
    Afanetti, Mickael
    Portefaix, Aurelie
    Baleine, Julien
    Durand, Sabine
    Combes, Clementine
    Douillard, Aymeric
    Cambonie, Gilles
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 43 (02) : 209 - 216