High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Prong Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Moderate to Severe Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Maya, Malini [1 ]
Rameshkumar, Ramachandran [1 ,2 ]
Selvan, Tamil [1 ]
Delhikumar, Chinnaiah Govindhareddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
[2] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ & Hlth Sci, Mediclin City Hosp, Dept Pediat, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
bronchiolitis; children; high-flow nasal cannula; mechanical ventilation; nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure; respiratory support; PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; VIRAL BRONCHIOLITIS; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; THERAPY; OXYGEN; CPAP;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000003521
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal prong bubble continuous positive airway pressure (b-CPAP) in children with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Design: A randomized controlled trial was carried out from August 2019 to February 2022. (Clinical Trials Registry of India number CTRI/2019/07/020402). Setting: Pediatric emergency ward and ICU within a tertiary care center in India. Patients: Children 1-23 months old with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Intervention: Comparison of HFNC with b-CPAP, using a primary outcome of treatment failure within 24 hours of randomization, as defined by any of: 1) a 1-point increase in modified Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS) above baseline, 2) a rise in respiratory rate (RR) greater than 10 per minute from baseline, and 3) escalation in respiratory support. The secondary outcomes were success rate after crossover, if any, need for mechanical ventilation (invasive/noninvasive), local skin lesions, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results: In 118 children analyzed by intention-to-treat, HFNC ( n = 59) versus b-CPAP ( n = 59) was associated with a lower failure rate (23.7% vs. 42.4%; relative risk [95% CI], RR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97], p = 0.031). The Cox proportion model confirmed a lower hazard of treatment failure in the HFNC group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.94], p = 0.032). No crossover was noted. A lower proportion escalated to noninvasive ventilation in the HFNC group (15.3%) versus the b-CPAP group (15.3% vs. 39% [RR 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20-0.77)], p = 0.004). The HFNC group had a longer median (interquartile range) duration of oxygen therapy (4 [3-6] vs. 3 [3-5] d; p = 0.012) and hospital stay (6 [5-8.5] vs. 5 [4-7] d, p = 0.021). No significant difference was noted in other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: In children aged one to 23 months with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis, the use of HFNC therapy as opposed to b-CPAP for early respiratory support is associated with a lower failure rate and, secondarily, a lower risk of escalation to mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study)
    Christophe Milési
    Sandrine Essouri
    Robin Pouyau
    Jean-Michel Liet
    Mickael Afanetti
    Aurélie Portefaix
    Julien Baleine
    Sabine Durand
    Clémentine Combes
    Aymeric Douillard
    Gilles Cambonie
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2017, 43 : 209 - 216
  • [32] Laryngeal mask airway or high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal cannula for advanced bronchoscopy: a randomised controlled trial
    Gavriely, Regina Pikman
    Freund, Ophir
    Tiran, Boaz
    Perluk, Tal Moshe
    Kleinhendler, Eyal
    Matot, Idit
    Bar-Shai, Amir
    Gershman, Evgeni
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [33] A Comparative Study between Postextubation of Preterm Neonates into High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Morsy, Ramy Saleh
    Badawy, Magda Mahmooud Sedky
    Said, Reem Nabil
    Ali, Aliaa Adel
    Abuelhamd, Walaa Alsharany
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [34] High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants
    Spence, K. L.
    Murphy, D.
    Kilian, C.
    McGonigle, R.
    Kilani, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (12) : 772 - 775
  • [35] High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants
    K L Spence
    D Murphy
    C Kilian
    R McGonigle
    R A Kilani
    Journal of Perinatology, 2007, 27 : 772 - 775
  • [36] Is high-flow nasal cannula better for children with bronchiolitis?
    Feng, Qingbo
    Feng, Xuping
    Liao, Wenwei
    Li, Jiaxin
    TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2022, 11 (10) : 1731 - 1732
  • [37] Effect Of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Nasal On Nasopharyngeal Airway Pressure And Respiratory Muscles Loading In Young Infants With Severe Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
    Matecki, S.
    Milesi, C.
    Baleine, J.
    Jacquot, A.
    Durand, S.
    Cambonie, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187
  • [38] OUTCOMES OF HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA AND NONINVASIVE POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION IN BRONCHIOLITIS
    Clayton, Jason
    Mckee, Bryan
    Slain, Katherine
    Rotta, Alexandre
    Shein, Steven
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [39] Outcomes of Children With Bronchiolitis Treated With High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
    Clayton, Jason A.
    McKee, Bryan
    Slain, Katherine N.
    Rotta, Alexandre T.
    Shein, Steven L.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (02) : 128 - 135
  • [40] Effect of high-flow nasal cannula nasal on nasopharyngeal airway pressure and respiratory muscles loading in young infants with severe acute viral bronchiolitis
    Matecki, S.
    Milesie, C.
    Baleine, J.
    Jacquot, A.
    Cambonie, G.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 27 : 89 - 89