Comparative study of simulation and experiment in determining 192Ir source strength for brachytherapy quality assurance

被引:0
|
作者
Ngoc, Tran Thi Bao [1 ,2 ]
Uy, Phan Quoc [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vuong, Le Quang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Thanh, Tran Thien [1 ,2 ]
Tao, Chau Van [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci, Fac Phys & Engn Phys, Dept Nucl Phys, 227 Nguyen Van Cu St,Dist 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Ho Chi Minh Oncol Hosp, Dept Radiat Technol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Univ Educ, Fac Phys, 280 An Duong Vuong St,Dist 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Brachytherapy; Air kerma strength; Monte Carlo; MCNP6; MONTE-CARLO; CO-60; BRACHYTHERAPY; DOSE DISTRIBUTION; IR-192; DOSIMETRY; CHAMBER; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112729
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This research is of paramount importance as it combines experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation to determine the air kerma strength of the 192Ir source, which plays a crucial role in dose calculations for brachytherapy treatment planning. The air kerma strength represents the source strength value, directly influencing the accuracy of dose calculations in cancer treatments. Verifying the source strength during each source exchange is essential to the quality assurance process. In this study, the 192Ir Gammamed Plus source, provided by Varian, was used to calculate the air kerma strength through experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation. The measurements were conducted on a brachytherapy system with an HDR 1000 Plus well-type ionization chamber and source tube 70010 from Standard Imaging. Using the MCNP6 code, we constructed a model equivalent to the experimental system, consisting of the source geometry, source tube, and well-type chamber, with source self-absorption also considered. The air kerma strength measurements differed from the certified value by less than 2 %, within the allowable range according to the AAPM TG40 recommendations. The experimental and simulation methods showed strong agreement, with less than 4.1 % discrepancies. Considering source self-absorption, the air kerma strength calculation for the 192Ir source was consistent across both methods. The findings of this study validate that we successfully built an experimental system model using the Monte Carlo simulation with the MCNP6 code. This model can be further developed for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of source geometry and materials on the transverse axis dosimetry of 192Ir brachytherapy sources
    Wang, RQ
    Sloboda, RS
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (01): : 37 - 48
  • [32] Monte Carlo dosimetry of a new 192Ir pulsed dose rate brachytherapy source
    Karaiskos, P
    Angelopoulos, A
    Pantelis, E
    Papagiannis, P
    Sakelliou, L
    Kouwenhoven, E
    Baltas, D
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [33] Physics elements of an algorithm for brachytherapy dose calculation in homogeneous media for 192Ir source
    Ababneh, Eshraq
    Dababneh, Saed
    Wadi-Ramahi, Shada
    Sharaf, Jamal
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2018, 149 : 90 - 103
  • [34] Verification of high dose rate 192Ir source position during brachytherapy treatment
    Batic, M.
    Burger, J.
    Cindro, V.
    Kramberger, G.
    Mandic, I.
    Mikuz, M.
    Studen, A.
    Zavrtanik, M.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2010, 617 (1-3): : 206 - 208
  • [35] Experience of using MOSFET detectors for dose verification measurements in an end-to-end 192Ir brachytherapy quality assurance system
    Persson, Maria
    Nilsson, Josef
    Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 17 (01) : 227 - 233
  • [36] Beam quality correction factors for dose measurements around 192Ir brachytherapy sources
    Thrapsanioti, Zoi
    Peppa, Vasiliki
    Hourdakis, Costas J.
    Karaiskos, Pantelis
    Lekatou, Aristea
    Pantelis, Evaggelos
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [37] Erratum to: Monte Carlo dosimetry of the IRAsource high dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source
    Akbar Sarabiasl
    Navid Ayoobian
    Hossein Poorbaygi
    Iraj Jabbari
    Mohammad Reza Javanshir
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2016, 39 : 591 - 591
  • [38] Film dosimetry calibration method for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy with an 192Ir source
    Schwob, Nathan
    Orion, Itzhak
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (05) : 1678 - 1683
  • [39] Determination of the dose rate around a HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source with the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector
    Rossi, Giulio
    Failing, Thomas
    Gainey, Mark
    Kollefrath, Michael
    Hensley, Frank
    Zink, Klemens
    Baltas, Dimos
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2023, 33 (04): : 463 - 478
  • [40] Enhancement and validation of Geant4 Brachytherapy application on clinical HDR 192Ir source
    Ababneh, Eshraq
    Dababneh, Saed
    Qatarneh, Sharif
    Wadi-Ramahi, Shada
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2014, 103 : 57 - 66