What do safety and risk mean to women who choose to birth at home? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chauncy, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Kate [2 ]
Bayes, Sara [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Hosp, St Albans, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Fitzroy, Australia
[3] Edith Cowen Univ, Perth, Australia
[4] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Murdoch, Australia
关键词
Homebirth; Decision-making; Safety; Risk; women's views; PLANNED HOSPITAL BIRTHS; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; DECISION-MAKING; HOMEBIRTH; PLACE; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EMPOWERMENT; CHILDBIRTH; REFLEXIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2025.104340
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite clear evidence to support the safety and efficacy of homebirth, the concept challenges the almost universal belief that hospital is the safest place to give birth. Homebirth remains largely unsupported around the world due to prevailing beliefs and constructs surrounding risk and safety. Despite barriers to access, women continue to choose home as a place to birth. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative research was conducted to explore and understand women's views on what constitutes risk and safety in labour and birth for those who choose to birth at home. All studies were evaluated for quality and relevance. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Analysis of the 29 papers included in this review identified three main themes: risk of hospital birth, risk of homebirth, and safety of homebirth, and convey that women who choose to birth at home view their social, emotional, psychological and spiritual safety as highly important, with homebirth protecting and respecting these factors. For the women in the studies we reviewed, physical safety was enhanced through having the expertise of a midwife present at their birth. Participants considered the cultural paradigm within hospital services to focus on care for the physical body and not the whole person, which had the potential to cause psychological and physical harm. Discussion: This review demonstrated that women who choose to birth at home assess risk and safety differently to the way health care institutions assess these parameters. These findings will be of interest to maternity services and educators of maternity care practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ENVIRONMENTAL RISK - WHAT DO WE MEAN
    HRUDEY, SE
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1992, 64 (06) : 755 - 755
  • [42] Safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraception for women who use opioids: A systematic review
    Ti, Angeline
    Stone, Rebecca H.
    Whiteman, Maura
    Curtis, Kathryn M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (06) : 480 - 483
  • [43] Impact of Vitamin A Supplementation on Pregnant Women and on Women Who Have Just Given Birth: A Systematic Review
    Cruz, Sabrina
    da Cruz, Suelem Pereira
    Ramalho, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2018, 37 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [44] To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions
    Coxon, Kirstie
    Sandall, Jane
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2014, 16 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [45] A Systematic Review of Reading Engagement Research: What Do We Mean, What Do We Know, and Where Do We Need to Go?
    Lee, Yongjun
    Jang, Bong Gee
    Smith, Kristin Conradi
    READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 (05) : 540 - 576
  • [46] EPILEPSY AND POOR MEMORY - WHO COMPLAINS AND WHAT DO THEY MEAN
    CORCORAN, R
    THOMPSON, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 32 : 199 - 208
  • [47] Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
    Natasha L Pavlin
    Jane M Gunn
    Rhian Parker
    Christopher K Fairley
    Jane Hocking
    BMC Public Health, 6
  • [48] Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
    Pavlin, Natasha L.
    Gunn, Jane M.
    Parker, Rhian
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Hocking, Jane
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 6 (1)
  • [49] Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review
    Scarf, Vanessa
    Catling, Christine
    Viney, Rosalie
    Homer, Caroline
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [50] Repeat antenatal glucocorticoids for women at risk of preterm birth: a Cochrane Systematic Review
    McKinlay, Christopher J. D.
    Crowther, Caroline A.
    Middleton, Philippa
    Harding, Jane E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (03) : 187 - 194