What do safety and risk mean to women who choose to birth at home? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chauncy, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Kate [2 ]
Bayes, Sara [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Hosp, St Albans, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Fitzroy, Australia
[3] Edith Cowen Univ, Perth, Australia
[4] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Murdoch, Australia
关键词
Homebirth; Decision-making; Safety; Risk; women's views; PLANNED HOSPITAL BIRTHS; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; DECISION-MAKING; HOMEBIRTH; PLACE; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EMPOWERMENT; CHILDBIRTH; REFLEXIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2025.104340
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite clear evidence to support the safety and efficacy of homebirth, the concept challenges the almost universal belief that hospital is the safest place to give birth. Homebirth remains largely unsupported around the world due to prevailing beliefs and constructs surrounding risk and safety. Despite barriers to access, women continue to choose home as a place to birth. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative research was conducted to explore and understand women's views on what constitutes risk and safety in labour and birth for those who choose to birth at home. All studies were evaluated for quality and relevance. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Analysis of the 29 papers included in this review identified three main themes: risk of hospital birth, risk of homebirth, and safety of homebirth, and convey that women who choose to birth at home view their social, emotional, psychological and spiritual safety as highly important, with homebirth protecting and respecting these factors. For the women in the studies we reviewed, physical safety was enhanced through having the expertise of a midwife present at their birth. Participants considered the cultural paradigm within hospital services to focus on care for the physical body and not the whole person, which had the potential to cause psychological and physical harm. Discussion: This review demonstrated that women who choose to birth at home assess risk and safety differently to the way health care institutions assess these parameters. These findings will be of interest to maternity services and educators of maternity care practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why Women in Ethiopia Give Birth at Home? A Systematic Review of Literature
    Weldegiorgis, Seifu Kebede
    Feyisa, Mulugeta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 13 : 1065 - 1079
  • [22] What Do You Mean by Medical Home?
    Friedberg, Mark W.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (06) : 444 - 445
  • [23] How Do Women Vote: What Women Post About Home Birth Compared With Hospital Birth on Reddit and TikTok
    Morris, Kelsey
    Lane, Fiona
    Nelson, Anita L.
    Stohl, Hindi
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 74S - 74S
  • [24] What does it mean when women choose midwives in Indonesia?
    Hodgkin, Kai
    Bartini, Istri
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2017, 30 : 17 - 17
  • [25] Home or away? Factors affecting where women choose to give birth
    Zelek, Barbara
    Orrantia, Eliseo
    Poole, Heather
    Strike, Jessica
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 53 : 78 - 83
  • [26] SAFETY - WHAT DO WE REALLY MEAN
    FAWCETT, HH
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 179 (MAR): : 4 - PRFR
  • [27] SAFETY - WHAT DO WE REALLY MEAN
    FAWCETT, HH
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1980, 180 (AUG): : 15 - PRFR
  • [28] SAFETY - WHAT DO WE REALLY MEAN
    FAWCETT, HH
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 181 (MAR): : 11 - PRFR
  • [29] How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Woof, Victoria G.
    Howell, Anthony
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Evans, D. Gareth
    French, David P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 127 (11) : 1916 - 1924
  • [30] How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Victoria G. Woof
    Anthony Howell
    Lorna McWilliams
    D. Gareth Evans
    David P. French
    British Journal of Cancer, 2022, 127 : 1916 - 1924