What do safety and risk mean to women who choose to birth at home? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chauncy, Candice [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Kate [2 ]
Bayes, Sara [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Hosp, St Albans, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Fitzroy, Australia
[3] Edith Cowen Univ, Perth, Australia
[4] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Murdoch, Australia
关键词
Homebirth; Decision-making; Safety; Risk; women's views; PLANNED HOSPITAL BIRTHS; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; DECISION-MAKING; HOMEBIRTH; PLACE; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; EMPOWERMENT; CHILDBIRTH; REFLEXIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.midw.2025.104340
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite clear evidence to support the safety and efficacy of homebirth, the concept challenges the almost universal belief that hospital is the safest place to give birth. Homebirth remains largely unsupported around the world due to prevailing beliefs and constructs surrounding risk and safety. Despite barriers to access, women continue to choose home as a place to birth. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative research was conducted to explore and understand women's views on what constitutes risk and safety in labour and birth for those who choose to birth at home. All studies were evaluated for quality and relevance. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Analysis of the 29 papers included in this review identified three main themes: risk of hospital birth, risk of homebirth, and safety of homebirth, and convey that women who choose to birth at home view their social, emotional, psychological and spiritual safety as highly important, with homebirth protecting and respecting these factors. For the women in the studies we reviewed, physical safety was enhanced through having the expertise of a midwife present at their birth. Participants considered the cultural paradigm within hospital services to focus on care for the physical body and not the whole person, which had the potential to cause psychological and physical harm. Discussion: This review demonstrated that women who choose to birth at home assess risk and safety differently to the way health care institutions assess these parameters. These findings will be of interest to maternity services and educators of maternity care practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Who is at risk and what do they know? Segmenting a population on their food safety knowledge
    McCarthy, M.
    Brennan, M.
    Kelly, A. L.
    Ritson, C.
    de Boer, M.
    Thompson, N.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2007, 18 (02) : 205 - 217
  • [32] Canadian women in timber ... who are they? What do they do?
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1996, 72 (06): : 573 - 573
  • [33] Who uses a means-tested scholarship, and what do they choose?
    Figlio, David
    Hart, Cassandra M. D.
    Metzger, Molly
    ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2010, 29 (02) : 301 - 317
  • [34] Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?
    Cannada, Lisa K.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (09) : 1957 - 1961
  • [35] How Do Women Vote: What Women Post About Home Birth Versus Hospital Birth on Popular Social Media Platforms
    Morris, Kelsey
    Lane, Fiona
    Nelson, Anita L.
    Stohl, Hindi E.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [36] Birth Spacing: What Do Women Intend?
    Bryant, Allison S.
    Nseyo, Onouwem
    Nakagawa, Sanae
    Gregorich, Steven
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 : 263A - 263A
  • [37] What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review
    Coates, Dominiek
    Thirukumar, Purshaiyna
    Spear, Virginia
    Brown, Georgia
    Henry, Amanda
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (04) : 323 - 333
  • [38] Planned home birth in Brazil: a systematic review
    Cursino, Thais Peloggia
    Benincasa, Miria
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2020, 25 (04): : 1433 - 1443
  • [39] What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion
    Polanski, Lukasz T.
    Baumgarten, Miriam N.
    Quenby, Siobhan
    Brosens, Jan
    Campbell, Bruce K.
    Raine-Fenning, Nicholas J.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 28 (04) : 409 - 423
  • [40] What Do We Mean by Physician Wellness? A Systematic Review of Its Definition and Measurement
    Brady, Keri J. S.
    Trockel, Mickey T.
    Khan, Christina T.
    Raj, Kristin S.
    Murphy, Mary Lou
    Bohman, Bryan
    Frank, Erica
    Louie, Alan K.
    Roberts, Laura Weiss
    ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 42 (01) : 94 - 108