Evaluation of debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to abutments of different designs and surface treatments

被引:0
|
作者
Khalifa, Ahmed Abdel Latif [1 ]
Metwally, Nayrouz Adel [2 ]
Khamis, Mohamed Moataz [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Clin Master Oral Implantol Program, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2025年 / 133卷 / 01期
关键词
RETENTIVE STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Straight preparable abutments provide an alternative to titanium bases (Ti- bases) for single-unit screw-retained implant-supported restorations. However, the debonding force between crowns with a screw access channel cemented to preparable abutments and Ti-bases of different designs and surface treatments is unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to straight preparable abutments and Ti- bases of different designs and surface treatments. Material and methods. Forty laboratory implant analogs (Straumann Bone Level) were embedded into epoxy resin blocks that were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10 each) according to the abutment type used: CEREC group, Variobase group, airborne-particle abraded Variobase group, and airborne-particle abraded straight preparable abutment group. All specimens were restored with lithium disilicate crowns and cemented with resin cement to the corresponding abutments. They were thermocycled (from 5 to 55 degrees C for 2000 cycles) followed by cyclic loading (120 000 cycles). The tensile forces required to debond the crowns from the corresponding abutments were measured (N) by using a universal testing machine. The ShapiroeWilk test of normality was used. Comparison between the study groups was done with 1-way ANOVA (a=.05). Results. Tensile debonding force values were significantly different according to the type of abutment used (P<.05). The highest retentive force value was recorded in the straight preparable abutment group (928.1 +/- 222.2 N) followed by the airborne-particle abraded Variobase group (852.6 +/- 164.6 N), and the CEREC group (498.8 +/- 136.6 N); the lowest value was reported in the Variobase group (158.6 +/- 85.2 N). Conclusions. The retention of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to airborne-particle abraded straight preparable abutments is significantly higher than to non-surface treated Ti-bases and similar to airborne-particle abraded ones. Abrading abutments with 50-mm Al2O3 significantly increased the debonding force of the lithium disilicate crowns. (J Prosthet Dent 2025;133:215-20)
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 220
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strain gauge analysis of implant-supported, screw-retained metal frameworks: Comparison between different manufacturing technologies
    Degidi, Marco
    Caligiana, Gianni
    Francia, Daniela
    Liverani, Alfredo
    Olmi, Giorgio
    Tornabene, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2016, 230 (09) : 840 - 846
  • [42] Full-Mouth Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Rehabilitation with Multiunit Abutments Using Virtual Guided Surgery and Digital Prosthetics Protocol
    Ashurko, Igor
    Trofimov, Artem
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Mekhtieva, Sabina
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2020, 2020
  • [43] Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue
    Spitznagel, F. A.
    Bonfante, E. A.
    Vollmer, F.
    Gierthmuehlen, P. C.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (02): : 136 - 146
  • [44] Resistance to Fracture in Fixed Dental Prostheses Over Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Cantilevers in the Anterior Region: An In Vitro Study
    Rues, Stefan
    Kappel, Stefanie
    Ruckes, Dorothee
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Zenthoefer, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [45] Effect of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in two implant-supported, screw-retained prostheses: A numerical and experimental study
    Chen, Jianyu
    Guo, Jiaer
    Yang, Lijia
    Wang, Lin
    Zhang, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (02): : 240.e1 - 240.e10
  • [46] Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cement-Retained, Implant- Supported Crowns
    Ozyetim, Esra Bilgi
    Ozdemir, Zeynep
    Basim, Gul Bahar
    Bayraktar, Gulsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [47] Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging
    Al-Zordk, Walid
    Al-Dobaisi, Tawfik
    Ghazy, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (04) : 723 - 729
  • [48] Original vs. non-original abutments for screw-retained single implant crowns: An in vitro evaluation of internal fit, mechanical behaviour and screw loosening
    Alonso-Perez, Raquel
    Bartolome, Jose F.
    Ferreiroa, Alberto
    Salido, Maria P.
    Pradies, Guillermo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (12) : 1230 - 1238
  • [49] Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An in vitro study
    Singh, Mahima
    Yadav, Bhupender Kumar
    Phukela, Sumit Singh
    Ritwal, Pankaj
    Nagpal, Abhishek
    Saluja, Pulin
    THE JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (03) : 240 - 248
  • [50] Evaluation of the marginal adaptation and debonding strength of two types of CAD-CAM implant-supported cement-retained crowns
    Ramzy, Nada Ahmed
    Azer, Amir Shoukry
    Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)