Electrical Bioimpedance-Based Monitoring of Intracochlear Tissue Changes After Cochlear Implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Sijgers, Leanne [1 ]
Geys, Marlies [1 ]
Geissler, Gunnar [2 ]
Boyle, Patrick [2 ]
Huber, Alexander [1 ]
Pfiffner, Flurin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Adv Bion GmbH, European Res Ctr, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
digital biomarkers; remote hearing healthcare; cochlear implant; neuroprosthetics; hearing technology; auditory rehabilitation; HEARING PRESERVATION; IMPEDANCE CHANGES; AUDITORY-NERVE; IN-VITRO; STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; MODEL; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/s24237570
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: This study examined electrical bioimpedance as a biomarker for intracochlear tissue changes after cochlear implant surgery, comparing monopolar, three-point, and four-point impedance measurements over time and evaluating different measurement systems and approaches. Methods: Impedance measurements were obtained from 21 participants during surgery and at four postoperative stages. Monopolar impedances were recorded using the Bionic Ear Data Collection System (BEDCS) and the Active Insertion Monitoring (AIM) system. Three- and four-point impedances were recorded directly using BEDCS, and indirect three-point impedances were additionally derived from Electrical Field Imaging matrices recorded using BEDCS or AIM. Results: There was an 11% relative error between monopolar measurements from BEDCS and AIM and a 25% discrepancy between direct and indirect three-point measurements. Despite this, direct and indirect measurements from both systems were useful for tracking postoperative impedance shifts. Three- and four-point measurements showed a strong relationship both during and after surgery. Our results suggest that three- and four-point measurements are more specific than monopolar impedances in capturing localized tissue changes. Conclusions: Three- and four-point impedance measurements are potential markers of intracochlear tissue changes over time. While direct three-point impedance measurements offer higher accuracy, indirect measurements provide a feasible alternative for monitoring intracochlear changes in clinical settings lacking the option of direct measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes in the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire After Cochlear Implantation
    Pan, Tao
    Tyler, Richard S.
    Ji, Haihong
    Coelho, Claudia
    Gehringer, Anne K.
    Gogel, Stephanie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 18 (02) : 144 - 151
  • [32] Timing of Acoustic Hearing Changes After Cochlear Implantation
    Jensen, Megan J.
    Isaac, Heba
    Hernandez, Helin
    Oleson, Jacob
    Dunn, Camille
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (10): : 2036 - 2043
  • [33] The utilization of brain plasticity by cochlear implants. Molecular and cellular changes due to electrical intracochlear stimulation
    Rosskothen-Kuhl, N.
    Illing, R. -B.
    HNO, 2015, 63 (02) : 94 - 103
  • [34] On the Intracochlear Location of Straight Electrode Arrays After Cochlear Implantation: How Lateral Are Lateral Wall Electrodes?
    Salcher, Rolf
    Boruchov, Aaron
    Timm, Max
    Steffens, Melanie
    Giesemann, Anja
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Warnecke, Athanasia
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : 242 - 250
  • [35] A Novel Tissue Identification Framework in Cataract Surgery Using an Integrated Bioimpedance-Based Probe and Machine Learning Algorithms
    AghajaniPedram, Sahba
    Ferguson, Peter
    Gerber, Matthew
    Shin, Changyeob
    Hubschman, J-P
    Rosen, Jacob
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 69 (02) : 910 - 920
  • [36] Real-Time Bioimpedance-Based Biopsy Needle Can Identify Tissue Type with High Spatial Accuracy
    Sanna Halonen
    Juho Kari
    Petri Ahonen
    Kai Kronström
    Jari Hyttinen
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 47 : 836 - 851
  • [37] Are tinnitus burden and tinnitus exacerbation after cochlear implantation influenced by insertion technique, array dislocation, and intracochlear trauma?
    Everad, F.
    Beck, R. L.
    Aschendorff, A.
    Rauch, A. K.
    Fries, Leonie
    Arndt, S.
    Ketterer, M. C.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [38] A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation
    Hartl, Renee M. Banakis
    Mattingly, Jameson K.
    Greene, Nathaniel T.
    Jenkins, Herman A.
    Cass, Stephen P.
    Tollin, Daniel J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (09) : 1291 - 1299
  • [39] Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation
    Zhang, Hongzheng
    Stark, Gemaine
    Reiss, Lina
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (07) : 1157 - 1165
  • [40] Prospective, Multicenter Study on Tinnitus Changes after Cochlear Implantation
    Kim, Dong-Kee
    Moon, In Seok
    Lim, Hye Jin
    Yoo, Shin-Young
    Heo, Kyung Wook
    Bae, Seong-Cheon
    Moon, Kyung Ray
    Lee, Jong Joo
    Choung, Yun-Hoon
    Park, Shi-Nae
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2016, 21 (03) : 165 - 171