Futureproofing Complex Infrastructure Projects Using Real Options

被引:4
|
作者
Krystallis I. [1 ]
Locatelli G. [2 ]
Murtagh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, London
[2] School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
Complex projects; flexibility; infrastructure; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2020.3036446
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing project performance measures in the infrastructure sector focus on the construction performance (time, cost, quality) and pay less attention to lifecycle performance. The consequence of this shortsighted perspective is that decisions taken early lead to poorer solutions. Infrastructure that should last centuries quickly becomes inadequate, leading to costly reconfigurations. Real options reasoning can help managers to overcome this issue by unlocking lifecycle performance thinking in complex infrastructure projects. Real options reasoning enables managers to explore the value of flexibility by employing futureproofing strategies during the development process. From the analysis of interviews with experts in healthcare infrastructure, we observed that projects that led to obsolescence were developed using tight design briefs and were focused on capital targets, and decision-makers were less invested in the concept of futureproofing. On the other hand, projects that were futureproofed followed a loosely defined design brief and shifted focus toward whole-life targets. We make five recommendations for futureproofed infrastructure. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real Options for Increasing Value in Industrial Water Infrastructure
    Pongsak Suttinon
    Seigo Nasu
    Water Resources Management, 2010, 24 : 2881 - 2892
  • [42] Buying real options - Valuing uncertainty in infrastructure planning
    Herder, Paulien M.
    de Joode, Jeroen
    Ligtvoet, Andreas
    Schenk, Sigrid
    Taneja, Poonam
    FUTURES, 2011, 43 (09) : 961 - 969
  • [43] Real Options for Increasing Value in Industrial Water Infrastructure
    Suttinon, Pongsak
    Nasu, Seigo
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2010, 24 (12) : 2881 - 2892
  • [44] Options-based negotiation management of PPP–BOT infrastructure projects
    Attarzadeh M.
    Chua D.K.H.
    Beer M.
    Abbott E.L.S.
    Construction Management and Economics, 2017, 35 (11-12) : 676 - 692
  • [45] AN ESTIMATION OF PROFITABILITY OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY USING REAL OPTIONS THEORY
    Kosowski, Piotr
    Stopa, Jerzy
    ARCHIVES OF MINING SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (02) : 391 - 401
  • [46] Valuation of Wind Energy Projects: A Real Options Approach
    Abadie, Luis M.
    Chamorro, Jose M.
    ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) : 3218 - 3255
  • [47] VALUATION OF PATENTS AND R&D PROJECTS USING REAL OPTIONS: A PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION
    Alvarez, Lucia
    Blanco, Felipe
    Ruiz, Felipe
    Solana, Pablo
    DIRECCION Y ORGANIZACION, 2008, 35 : 125 - 130
  • [48] REAL OPTIONS ANALYSIS OF PETROCHEMICALS INDUSTRY INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    Costa, Leticia de Almeida
    Samanez, Carlos Patricio
    INTERCIENCIA, 2014, 39 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [49] Research and Development Projects Upon Real Options View
    Metelski, Dominik
    Mihi-Ramirez, Antonio
    Arteaga-Ortiz, Jesus
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2014, 25 (03): : 283 - 293
  • [50] Real options as an alternative methodology to assess investment projects
    Tamara Ayus, Armando Lenin
    Aristizabal Velasquez, Raul Enrique
    ECOS DE ECONOMIA, 2012, 16 (35): : 29 - 44