Futureproofing Complex Infrastructure Projects Using Real Options

被引:4
|
作者
Krystallis I. [1 ]
Locatelli G. [2 ]
Murtagh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, London
[2] School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
Complex projects; flexibility; infrastructure; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2020.3036446
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing project performance measures in the infrastructure sector focus on the construction performance (time, cost, quality) and pay less attention to lifecycle performance. The consequence of this shortsighted perspective is that decisions taken early lead to poorer solutions. Infrastructure that should last centuries quickly becomes inadequate, leading to costly reconfigurations. Real options reasoning can help managers to overcome this issue by unlocking lifecycle performance thinking in complex infrastructure projects. Real options reasoning enables managers to explore the value of flexibility by employing futureproofing strategies during the development process. From the analysis of interviews with experts in healthcare infrastructure, we observed that projects that led to obsolescence were developed using tight design briefs and were focused on capital targets, and decision-makers were less invested in the concept of futureproofing. On the other hand, projects that were futureproofed followed a loosely defined design brief and shifted focus toward whole-life targets. We make five recommendations for futureproofed infrastructure. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of Investments in Electricity Infrastructure Using Real Options and Multiobjective Formulation
    Cesena, E. A. M.
    Davalos, F. R.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2011, 9 (05) : 767 - 773
  • [22] Using real options for urban infrastructure adaptation under climate change
    Kim, Kyeongseok
    Ha, Sooji
    Kim, Hyoungkwan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 40 - 50
  • [23] Real Options Application in Real Estate Projects Evaluation
    Grzeszczyk, Tadeusz A.
    Waszkiewicz, Malgorzata
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ICMESD 2016), 2016, : 920 - 925
  • [24] Flexible Infrastructure Design: A Real Options Reasoning Approach to Navigating Uncertainty in Large-Scale Projects
    Krystallis, Ilias
    Mahi, Zine Al Abidine Laraqui
    Di Maddaloni, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 40 (03)
  • [25] A Real Options Approach For Software Development Projects Using Fuzzy Electre
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 18 (5-6) : 541 - 560
  • [26] The Valuation of Geothermal Power Projects in Indonesia Using Real Options Valuation
    Bilqist, Reza A.
    Dachyar, M.
    Farizal
    4TH ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (ESTIC 2018), 2018, 248
  • [27] A valuation of wind power projects in Germany using real regulatory options
    Monjas Barroso, Manuel
    Balibrea Iniesta, Jose
    ENERGY, 2014, 77 : 422 - 433
  • [28] Management of Regional Corporate Innovation Projects Using Compound Real Options
    Yashin, Sergey
    Yashina, Nadezhda
    Koshelev, Egor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2019, 8 (02) : 22 - 36
  • [29] Valuation of Drainage Infrastructure Improvement Under Climate Change Using Real Options
    Park, Taeil
    Kim, Changyoon
    Kim, Hyoungkwan
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (02) : 445 - 457
  • [30] Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
    Manocha, Nishtha
    Babovic, Vladan
    WATER, 2018, 10 (02)