Futureproofing Complex Infrastructure Projects Using Real Options

被引:4
|
作者
Krystallis I. [1 ]
Locatelli G. [2 ]
Murtagh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, London
[2] School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
Complex projects; flexibility; infrastructure; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2020.3036446
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing project performance measures in the infrastructure sector focus on the construction performance (time, cost, quality) and pay less attention to lifecycle performance. The consequence of this shortsighted perspective is that decisions taken early lead to poorer solutions. Infrastructure that should last centuries quickly becomes inadequate, leading to costly reconfigurations. Real options reasoning can help managers to overcome this issue by unlocking lifecycle performance thinking in complex infrastructure projects. Real options reasoning enables managers to explore the value of flexibility by employing futureproofing strategies during the development process. From the analysis of interviews with experts in healthcare infrastructure, we observed that projects that led to obsolescence were developed using tight design briefs and were focused on capital targets, and decision-makers were less invested in the concept of futureproofing. On the other hand, projects that were futureproofed followed a loosely defined design brief and shifted focus toward whole-life targets. We make five recommendations for futureproofed infrastructure. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle approach for sustainable pavement options for infrastructure projects
    Czarnecki, B.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 1425 - 1429
  • [32] Valuation of Drainage Infrastructure Improvement Under Climate Change Using Real Options
    Taeil Park
    Changyoon Kim
    Hyoungkwan Kim
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 445 - 457
  • [33] Real options analysis framework for agile projects
    Miller, Gloria J.
    2024 19TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, FEDCSIS 2024, 2024, : 429 - 441
  • [34] Evaluating Real Options in Remediation Investment Projects
    Zhang, Danyang
    Finkel, Michael
    Bayer, Peter
    CONSOIL 2008: THEME F - SUSTAINABLE & RISK BASED LAND MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 9 - 17
  • [35] Evaluation of innovative projects in the "space of real options"
    Kryukov, S., V
    TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2011, 9 (02): : 58 - 62
  • [36] THE REAL OPTIONS APPROACH TO CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    Alexakhin, Aleksandar
    Zaytsev, Ivan
    MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, 2019, : 644 - 651
  • [37] UTILITY OF REAL OPTIONS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    Abreu Zambrano, Alibeth
    Paredes, Dorys
    VISION GERENCIAL, 2014, 13 (02): : 175 - 188
  • [38] Valuing Sequential IT Projects Using Real Options Analysis Completed Research Paper
    Burke, John C.
    OConnor, Scott F.
    AMCIS 2013 PROCEEDINGS, 2013,
  • [39] Optimization of a Portfolio of Investment Projects: A Real Options Approach Using the Omega Measure
    Castro, Javier G.
    Tito, Edison A.
    Brandao, Luiz E.
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (11)
  • [40] Improving Economic Assessments of Clean Development Mechanism Projects Using Real Options
    Kokkaew, Nakhon
    Sampim, Tatcha
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES (2013 AEDCEE), 2014, 52 : 449 - 458