Futureproofing Complex Infrastructure Projects Using Real Options

被引:4
|
作者
Krystallis I. [1 ]
Locatelli G. [2 ]
Murtagh N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, London
[2] School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds
来源
IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2021年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
Complex projects; flexibility; infrastructure; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1109/EMR.2020.3036446
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing project performance measures in the infrastructure sector focus on the construction performance (time, cost, quality) and pay less attention to lifecycle performance. The consequence of this shortsighted perspective is that decisions taken early lead to poorer solutions. Infrastructure that should last centuries quickly becomes inadequate, leading to costly reconfigurations. Real options reasoning can help managers to overcome this issue by unlocking lifecycle performance thinking in complex infrastructure projects. Real options reasoning enables managers to explore the value of flexibility by employing futureproofing strategies during the development process. From the analysis of interviews with experts in healthcare infrastructure, we observed that projects that led to obsolescence were developed using tight design briefs and were focused on capital targets, and decision-makers were less invested in the concept of futureproofing. On the other hand, projects that were futureproofed followed a loosely defined design brief and shifted focus toward whole-life targets. We make five recommendations for futureproofed infrastructure. © 1973-2011 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Talking About Futureproofing: Real Options Reasoning in Complex Infrastructure Projects
    Krystallis, Ilias
    Locatelli, Giorgio
    Murtagh, Niamh
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (06) : 3009 - 3022
  • [2] Real Options in Telecom Infrastructure Projects - A Tutorial
    Tahon, Mathieu
    Verbrugge, Sofie
    Willis, Peter J.
    Botham, Paul
    Colle, Didier
    Pickavet, Mario
    Demeester, Piet
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2014, 16 (02): : 1157 - 1173
  • [3] TOWARDS AN ASSESSMENT OF RESILIENCE IN TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS USING REAL OPTIONS
    Mak, Jonathan
    Cassidy, Steve
    Clarkson, P. John
    DS87-2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN (ICED 17), VOL 2: DESIGN PROCESSES, DESIGN ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 487 - 496
  • [4] Valuation of Infrastructure Projects: Review of the Real Options Literature
    Marques, Naielly Lopes
    Sanchez, Liliana Dennis Mejia
    Brandao, Luiz Eduardo Teixeira
    Bastian-Pinto, Carlos de Lamare
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (05) : 174 - 183
  • [5] Using jump-diffusion modeling for valuing real options in infrastructure projects
    Guoxing Zhang
    Ju’e Guo
    Guorong Chai
    Li Gong
    Xuejun Wang
    Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2010, 4 : 263 - 270
  • [6] Using jump-diffusion modeling for valuing real options in infrastructure projects
    Zhang, Guoxing
    Guo, Ju'e
    Chai, Guorong
    Gong, Li
    Wang, Xuejun
    FRONTIERS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE IN CHINA, 2010, 4 (02): : 263 - 270
  • [7] Valuing governmental support in infrastructure projects as real options using Monte Carlo simulation
    Cheah, Charles Y. J.
    Liu, Jicai
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (05) : 545 - 554
  • [8] Credit risk in infrastructure PPP projects under the real options approach
    Quimbayo, Carlos Andres Zapata
    Vega, Carlos Armando Mejia
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (04) : 293 - 306
  • [9] Valuing Simple Multiple-Exercise Real Options in Infrastructure Projects
    Chiara, Nicola
    Garvin, Michael J.
    Vecer, Jan
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [10] Using Real Options for the Evaluation of Venture Projects
    Baranov, Alexander
    Muzyke, Elena
    GADJAH MADA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2016, 18 (02) : 153 - 185