Comparative sustainability assessment using three rating systems in the Myanmar context

被引:4
|
作者
Shwe T. [1 ]
Iki K. [1 ]
Homma R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Architecture and Environment Planning, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
[2] Architectural History and Urban Planning, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
关键词
BREEAM communities; CASBEE-UD; Developing country; LEED-ND; Mandalay; Myanmar; Neighbourhood development; Pathein; Sustainability assessment; Yangon;
D O I
10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-197-207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学]; TV [水利工程];
学科分类号
0813 ; 0815 ;
摘要
To address the gap of sustainable development in developing countries, this study conducted a sustainability assessment of multiple neighbourhood developments in Myanmar using well-known international rating systems/tools established in developed countries. The study examined three cases, each a neighbourhood development in three significant cities, using the three rating systems. First, the study content analysed the three tools to determine the effectiveness of the rating systems. Following this, evaluation performances reflected the degree of compliance of the cases with each system through different results of specific developments. The shortcomings of the selected tools and weaknesses of the case studies determined that there is no perfect tool from developed countries to demonstrate the sustainability performance of the cases in developing countries. This research successfully interpreted the strengths and weaknesses of the Myanmar case studies to strengthen sustainability in the future. © 2018 WIT Press
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems in Building Sustainability Rating Systems
    Reyes, Marcelo
    Perez, Gabriel
    Coma, Julia
    LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [42] A COMPARISON AMONG THE RATING SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF GREEN BUILDING: A REVIEW
    Nindita, Velma
    Purwanto, Purwanto
    Windarta, Jaka
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (06): : 1037 - 1046
  • [43] Systems Assessment of Beef Sustainability
    Sawyer, Jason E.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) : 209 - 217
  • [44] Sustainability assessment of industrial systems
    Lou, HH
    Kulkarni, MA
    Singh, A
    Hopper, JR
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (15) : 4233 - 4242
  • [45] Sustainability assessment of production systems
    Petry M.
    Köhler C.
    Zhang H.
    ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 2021, 116 (7-8): : 511 - 514
  • [46] Utilization of life-cycle analysis to evaluate sustainability rating systems for construction projects with a case study on Qatar Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS)
    Attallah, Sherif Omar
    Senouci, Ahmad
    Kandil, Amr
    Al-Derham, Hassan
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (03) : 272 - 287
  • [47] An integrated approach for sustainability assessment: the Wa-Pa-Su project sustainability rating system
    Poveda, Cesar A.
    Lipsett, Michael G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01): : 85 - 98
  • [48] A critical review of the effectiveness of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS) framework on campus sustainability
    Doocy, Lauren E.
    Zarmehr, Arash
    Kider, Joseph T., Jr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF BUILDING SIMULATION 2021: 17TH CONFERENCE OF IBPSA, 2022, 17 : 629 - 635
  • [49] Comparative LCA of thermal power plant with CCS and solar PV system: sustainability assessment in Indian context
    Malode, Satyajit
    Prakash, Ravi
    Mohanta, Jagadish Chandra
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (54) : 62853 - 62876
  • [50] Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools
    Bilec, Melissa M. (mbilec@pitt.edu), 1600, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), United States (23):