Comparative sustainability assessment using three rating systems in the Myanmar context

被引:4
|
作者
Shwe T. [1 ]
Iki K. [1 ]
Homma R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Architecture and Environment Planning, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
[2] Architectural History and Urban Planning, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
关键词
BREEAM communities; CASBEE-UD; Developing country; LEED-ND; Mandalay; Myanmar; Neighbourhood development; Pathein; Sustainability assessment; Yangon;
D O I
10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-197-207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学]; TV [水利工程];
学科分类号
0813 ; 0815 ;
摘要
To address the gap of sustainable development in developing countries, this study conducted a sustainability assessment of multiple neighbourhood developments in Myanmar using well-known international rating systems/tools established in developed countries. The study examined three cases, each a neighbourhood development in three significant cities, using the three rating systems. First, the study content analysed the three tools to determine the effectiveness of the rating systems. Following this, evaluation performances reflected the degree of compliance of the cases with each system through different results of specific developments. The shortcomings of the selected tools and weaknesses of the case studies determined that there is no perfect tool from developed countries to demonstrate the sustainability performance of the cases in developing countries. This research successfully interpreted the strengths and weaknesses of the Myanmar case studies to strengthen sustainability in the future. © 2018 WIT Press
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The three architectures within the context of the environment and sustainability
    Alonso Garcia, Francisco Ramon
    OBSERVATORIO MEDIOAMBIENTAL, 2006, 9 : 97 - 109
  • [32] Environmental impact assessment of irrigation systems using sustainability indices
    Manoliadis, O
    Baronos, A
    Tsolas, L
    Vatalis, K
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIOANL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL C, POSTERS, 2001, : 291 - 297
  • [33] Comparative Sustainability Assessment of Starch Nanocrystals
    Déborah LeCorre
    Catharina Hohenthal
    Alain Dufresne
    Julien Bras
    Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2013, 21 : 71 - 80
  • [34] Comparative Sustainability Assessment of Starch Nanocrystals
    LeCorre, Deborah
    Hohenthal, Catharina
    Dufresne, Alain
    Bras, Julien
    JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 21 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [35] Assessment of social sustainability: A comparative analysis
    Abed A.R.
    Abed, Amal R. (a_abed@asu.edu.jo), 1600, ICE Publishing (170): : 72 - 82
  • [36] Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems
    Nguyen, Binh K.
    Altan, Hasim
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2011, 21 : 376 - 386
  • [37] A comparative review of building component rating systems
    Faqih, Faisal
    Zayed, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 33
  • [38] Social dimension of sustainability: Assessment in the agribusiness context
    Massuca, Jose
    Marta-Costa, Ana
    Lucas, Maria Raquel
    NEW MEDIT, 2023, 23 (02): : 63 - 80
  • [39] Models and Indices of Sustainability Assessment in the Energy Context
    Ziemba, Pawel
    Becker, Aneta
    Becker, Jaroslaw
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (24)
  • [40] Cohousing and sustainability rating systems: Opportunities for planning groups and developers
    Wei, Lv
    Allen, April D.
    Davis, Lee
    Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2015, 9 (01): : 154 - 163