Comparative sustainability assessment using three rating systems in the Myanmar context

被引:4
|
作者
Shwe T. [1 ]
Iki K. [1 ]
Homma R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Architecture and Environment Planning, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
[2] Architectural History and Urban Planning, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
关键词
BREEAM communities; CASBEE-UD; Developing country; LEED-ND; Mandalay; Myanmar; Neighbourhood development; Pathein; Sustainability assessment; Yangon;
D O I
10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-197-207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学]; TV [水利工程];
学科分类号
0813 ; 0815 ;
摘要
To address the gap of sustainable development in developing countries, this study conducted a sustainability assessment of multiple neighbourhood developments in Myanmar using well-known international rating systems/tools established in developed countries. The study examined three cases, each a neighbourhood development in three significant cities, using the three rating systems. First, the study content analysed the three tools to determine the effectiveness of the rating systems. Following this, evaluation performances reflected the degree of compliance of the cases with each system through different results of specific developments. The shortcomings of the selected tools and weaknesses of the case studies determined that there is no perfect tool from developed countries to demonstrate the sustainability performance of the cases in developing countries. This research successfully interpreted the strengths and weaknesses of the Myanmar case studies to strengthen sustainability in the future. © 2018 WIT Press
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability assessment of products: A comparative study of sustainability assessment tools
    Borja, Vicente
    Avila, Javier
    Lopez-Parra, Marcelo
    Ramirez-Reivich, Alejandro
    Espinosa, Adrian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2014, VOL 11, 2015,
  • [22] Sustainability assessment, rating systems and historical buildings Case study: Rehabilitated construction in a university site
    Sadrykia, Somayeh
    Medghalchi, Leila
    Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad
    4TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016 (IBCC 2016), 2016, 66
  • [23] Development of Manufacturing Sustainability Assessment Using Systems Thinking
    Moldavska, Anastasiia
    Welo, Torgeir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01)
  • [24] Sustainability Rating Systems for Historic Buildings: A Systematic Review
    Karimi, Farzaneh
    Valibeig, Nima
    Memarian, Gholamhossein
    Kamari, Aliakbar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [25] Comprehensive Analysis of Sustainability Rating Systems for Road Infrastructure
    Mehraban, Rajab Ali
    Tsantilis, Lucia
    Riviera, Pier Paolo
    Santagata, Ezio
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2025, 10 (01)
  • [26] A review of emissions on pavement materials and sustainability rating systems
    Castro, C.
    Sabogal, D.
    Fernandez, W.
    REVISTA INGENIERIA DE CONSTRUCCION, 2022, 37 (02): : 280 - 291
  • [27] Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustainability
    Oluwalaiye, Oluwatobi
    Ozbek, Mehmet E.
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [28] Waste management systems in the context of sustainability
    Kozel, Roman
    Belica, Josef
    Kempa, Filip
    Chlopecky, Jakub
    Grycz, Ondrej
    Cehlar, Michal
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2024, 29 (01) : 180 - 192
  • [29] Global trends in sustainability rating assessment systems and their role in achieving sustainable urban communities in Saudi Arabia
    Hegazy, Ibrahim
    Helmi, Mansour
    Qurnfulah, Emad
    Maddah, Rahif
    Ibrahim, Hossam Samir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 16 (03) : 882 - 893
  • [30] Evaluating Building Sustainability Rating Systems: Standards and Methodologies for Energy-Water Based Assessment Criteria
    Mohammed, Yousif
    Hayder, Gasim
    Thiruchelvam, Sivadass
    Aziz, Hamidi Abdul
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (12) : 4823 - 4850