Comparative sustainability assessment using three rating systems in the Myanmar context

被引:4
|
作者
Shwe T. [1 ]
Iki K. [1 ]
Homma R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Architecture and Environment Planning, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
[2] Architectural History and Urban Planning, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University
关键词
BREEAM communities; CASBEE-UD; Developing country; LEED-ND; Mandalay; Myanmar; Neighbourhood development; Pathein; Sustainability assessment; Yangon;
D O I
10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-197-207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学]; TV [水利工程];
学科分类号
0813 ; 0815 ;
摘要
To address the gap of sustainable development in developing countries, this study conducted a sustainability assessment of multiple neighbourhood developments in Myanmar using well-known international rating systems/tools established in developed countries. The study examined three cases, each a neighbourhood development in three significant cities, using the three rating systems. First, the study content analysed the three tools to determine the effectiveness of the rating systems. Following this, evaluation performances reflected the degree of compliance of the cases with each system through different results of specific developments. The shortcomings of the selected tools and weaknesses of the case studies determined that there is no perfect tool from developed countries to demonstrate the sustainability performance of the cases in developing countries. This research successfully interpreted the strengths and weaknesses of the Myanmar case studies to strengthen sustainability in the future. © 2018 WIT Press
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rating systems for the sustainability assessment of infrastructure
    Milic, Ivana
    Bleiziffer, Jelena
    GRADEVINAR, 2024, 76 (04): : 335 - 345
  • [2] Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems
    Berardi U.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15 (6) : 1573 - 1591
  • [3] SUSTAINABILITY RATING SYSTEMS
    Mehdizadeh, Roshan
    Fischer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2012, 7 (02): : 177 - 199
  • [4] Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings
    Berardi, Umberto
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 20 (06) : 411 - 424
  • [5] Sustainability assessment of facilities - a comparative analysis of rating schemes Case VTT Digitalo
    Airaksinen, Miimu
    Huovila, Pekka
    Nummelin, Johanna
    Tuominen, Pekka
    LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 262 : 95 - 105
  • [6] Using systems for sustainability in the context of Agenda 21
    Blackmore, C
    SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: PEOPLE, ORGANIZATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENTS, 1997, : 21 - 26
  • [7] Adaptation of international sustainability rating tools to Bahrain A comparative analysis of eleven systems
    Al Khalifa, Fay Abdulla
    ARCHNET-IJAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (01) : 169 - 193
  • [8] Comparison of Three Retaining Wall Condition Assessment Rating Systems
    Gabr, Mohammed A.
    Rasdorf, William
    Findley, Daniel J.
    Butler, Cedrick J.
    Bert, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2018, 24 (01)
  • [9] Insights on Green Building Rating Systems for Housing in India and Their Assessment with Pillars of Sustainability
    Piparsania, Kratika
    Kalita, Pratul
    WITH DESIGN: REINVENTING DESIGN MODES, IASDR 2021, 2022, : 2464 - 2484
  • [10] Comparative analysis of rating systems in developing and developed countries: A systematic review and a future agenda towards a region-based sustainability assessment
    Zarghami, Esmaeil
    Fatourehchi, Dorsa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254 (254)