Comparison of intelligent 4D CT sequence scanning and conventional spiral 4D CT: A first comprehensive phantom study

被引:13
|
作者
Werner R. [1 ]
Szkitsak J. [2 ,3 ]
Sentker T. [1 ]
Madesta F. [1 ]
Schwarz A. [3 ,4 ]
Fernolendt S. [3 ,4 ]
Vornehm M. [3 ,4 ]
Gauer T. [1 ]
Bert C. [2 ,3 ]
Hofmann C. [4 ]
机构
[1] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg
[2] Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friederich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
[3] Friederich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
[4] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstr. 3, Forchheim
来源
Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2021年 / 66卷 / 01期
关键词
4D CT; I4DCT; Motion artifacts; Radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/abc93a
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
4D CT imaging is a cornerstone of 4D radiotherapy treatment. Clinical 4D CT data are, however, often affected by severe artifacts. The artifacts are mainly caused by breathing irregularity and retrospective correlation of breathing phase information and acquired projection data, which leads to insufficient projection data coverage to allow for proper reconstruction of 4D CT phase images. The recently introduced 4D CT approach i4DCT (intelligent 4D CT sequence scanning) aims to overcome this problem by breathing signal-driven tube control. The present motion phantom study describes the first in-depth evaluation of i4DCT in a real-world scenario. Twenty-eight 4D CT breathing curves of lung and liver tumor patients with pronounced breathing irregularity were selected to program the motion phantom. For every motion pattern, 4D CT imaging was performed with i4DCT and a conventional spiral 4D CT mode. For qualitative evaluation, the reconstructed 4D CT images were presented to clinical experts, who scored image quality. Further quantitative evaluation was based on established image intensity-based artifact metrics to measure (dis)similarity of neighboring image slices. In addition, beam-on and scan times of the scan modes were analyzed. The expert rating revealed a significantly higher image quality for the i4DCT data. The quantitative evaluation further supported the qualitative: While 20% of the slices of the conventional spiral 4D CT images were found to be artifact-affected, the corresponding fraction was only 4% for i4DCT. The beam-on time (surrogate of imaging dose) did not significantly differ between i4DCT and spiral 4D CT. Overall i4DCT scan times (time between first beam-on and last beam-on event, including scan breaks to compensate for breathing irregularity) were, on average, 53% longer compared to spiral CT. Thus, the results underline that i4DCT significantly improves 4D CT image quality compared to standard spiral CT scanning in the case of breathing irregularity during scanning. © 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of 4D CT Image Reconstruction Using a 3D Lung Phantom
    Zheng, Y.
    Girbino, M.
    Oshinsky, R.
    Vroege, L.
    Jesseph, F.
    Lee, S.
    Yuan, J.
    Machtay, M.
    Sohn, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [32] Assessment of motion and SUV recovery in 3D and 4D PET/CT: a multicentre phantom study
    Marin, K. J. Ortega
    Lambrecht, M.
    Arends, A. J.
    Adebahr, S.
    Nestle, U.
    Vogel, W.
    Verheij, M.
    Sonke, J. J.
    Hurkmans, C. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S540 - S540
  • [33] Impact of baseline shifts on 4D cone-beam CT images using a 4D phantom driven by lung tumor motions
    Moriwaki, H.
    Shiraishi, K.
    Sakumi, A.
    Ikeda, T.
    Shimizu, W.
    Yoda, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S981 - S981
  • [34] Comparison of single and multi-slice CT for 4D CT with respiratory gating
    Pan, T
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1473 - 1473
  • [35] Performance evaluation of the first model of 4D CT-scanner
    Endo, M
    Tanada, S
    Kandatsu, S
    Kusakabe, M
    Aradate, H
    Satoh, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 405 - 405
  • [36] 4D Predictive Patient-Specific Anatomical Model Based On 4D CT Data: A Feasibility Study
    Guo, B.
    He, W.
    Eom, J.
    De, S.
    Xu, X.
    Shi, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 2501 - +
  • [37] Performance evaluation of the first model of 4D CT-scanner
    Endo, M
    Mori, S
    Tsunoo, T
    Kandatsu, S
    Tanada, S
    Aradate, H
    Saito, Y
    Miyazaki, H
    Satoh, K
    Matsusita, S
    Kusakabe, M
    CARS 2003: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 1256 : 19 - 25
  • [38] Abdominal and pancreatic motion correlation using 4D CT, 4D transponders, and a gating belt
    Betancourt, Ricardo
    Zou, Wei
    Plastaras, John P.
    Metz, James M.
    Teo, Boon-Keng
    Kassaee, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (03): : 13 - 24
  • [39] Validation of the path integration of 4D dose distributions with 4D phantom measurements
    Zhang, GG
    Guerrero, TM
    Forster, K
    Fischer, G
    Fitzpatrick, M
    Starkschall, G
    Ibbott, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S608 - S609
  • [40] Establishing a framework to implement 4D XCAT Phantom for 4D radiotherapy research
    Panta, Raj K.
    Segars, Paul
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Cai, Jing
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 8 (04) : 565 - 570