Seas the opportunity: multi-criteria decision analysis to identify and prioritise blue carbon wetland restoration sites

被引:1
|
作者
Howie, Alice H. [1 ]
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Kondylas, Stella [1 ]
Russell, Sophie K. [3 ,4 ]
Reeves, Simon E. [1 ,5 ]
Ament, Judith M. [6 ]
Castro, Miguel [7 ]
Detmar, Sharie [8 ]
机构
[1] Nat Conservancy Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ South Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Environm Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Natl Ctr Coasts & Climate, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA
[7] Nature Conservancy, Quito, Ecuador
[8] Dept Environm & Water, Coast & Marine Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
natural climate solutions (NCS); GIS; carbon market; tidal marshes; mangroves; feasibility assessment; sea level rise; spatial modelling;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction: The emergence of voluntary carbon markets is creating new opportunities to sustainably finance Natural Climate Solution (NCS) projects. In Australia, the federal government recently enacted the Tidal Restoration of Blue Carbon Ecosystems Methodology Determination 2022 (Tidal Reconnection Method), whereby restoration activities that reintroduce tidal flows to allow the re-establishment of coastal wetland (blue carbon) ecosystems, through the removal or modification of a tidal restriction, can be used to gain and sell Australian carbon credit units. Australia has the highest net blue carbon wealth in the world, with 5%-11% of global carbon stocks, yet there is currently a lack of large-scale feasibility assessments and supporting methodologies to identify and prioritise sites with the greatest potential for NCS project implementation to help inform investment decisions. Methods: In this study, we applied a spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to identify, map, and prioritise potential sites for blue carbon coastal wetland restoration in South Australia that meet criteria outlined in the Tidal Reconnection Method. This study compared information on 1) predicted flooding extent following tidal reconnection and under sea level rise (SLR; present-day, 2050 and 2,100); 2) project implementation complexity (e.g. who possesses land tenure); and 3) carbon sequestration potential through predicted area of vegetation change under the above SLR scenarios. Results: Our results identified 64 sites of interest, of which 32 received an overall "high" prioritisation score of 3 or more out of 5. This equates to approximately 21,114 ha of high priority potential blue carbon restoration sites. Discussion: The MCDA enables development of a portfolio of viable restoration projects through a rapid "desktop" prioritisation of sites of interest, which can then guide investment in further detailed cost/benefit feasibility assessments. This study demonstrates an adaptable MCDA approach to map potential NCS projects at meaningful spatial scales and in-line with carbon market-based opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Big data analysis for multi-criteria decision making
    Kumar, Akshi
    Bhatia, M.P.S.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2021, 14 (05) : 1400 - 1401
  • [42] UNCERTAINTY AND PROBABILISTIC METHODS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    O Meachair, S.
    Walsh, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A579 - A579
  • [43] Integrating Uncertainties in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis with the ENTSCHEIDUNGSNAVI
    Peters, Sven
    Toensfeuerborn, Mendy
    von Nitzsch, Ruediger
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [44] Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and design thinking
    Geldermann, Jutta
    Lerche, Nils
    Sepulveda, Juan David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (05) : 708 - 739
  • [45] On the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Pascoe, Sean
    ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [46] Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: The TODIM method with criteria interactions
    Gomes L.F.A.M.
    Machado M.A.S.
    Rangel L.A.D.
    Annals of Operations Research, 2013, 211 (1) : 531 - 548
  • [47] EMPLOYING CARDINAL RANK ORDERING OF CRITERIA IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Riabacke, Mona
    Danielson, Mats
    Larsson, Aron
    Ekenberg, Love
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 76 - 82
  • [48] Stochastic Approaches for Criteria Weight Identification in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Paradowski, Bartosz
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    Salabun, Wojciech
    INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, PT I, ACIIDS 2024, 2024, 14795 : 40 - 51
  • [49] Comparing Two Multi-Criteria Methods for Prioritizing Wetland Restoration and Creation Sites Based on Ecological, Biophysical and Socio-Economic Factors
    Darwiche-Criado, Nadia
    Sorando, Ricardo
    Eismann, Silvia G.
    Comin, Francisco A.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (04) : 1227 - 1241
  • [50] Comparing Two Multi-Criteria Methods for Prioritizing Wetland Restoration and Creation Sites Based on Ecological, Biophysical and Socio-Economic Factors
    Nadia Darwiche-Criado
    Ricardo Sorando
    Silvia G. Eismann
    Francisco A. Comín
    Water Resources Management, 2017, 31 : 1227 - 1241