Seas the opportunity: multi-criteria decision analysis to identify and prioritise blue carbon wetland restoration sites

被引:1
|
作者
Howie, Alice H. [1 ]
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Kondylas, Stella [1 ]
Russell, Sophie K. [3 ,4 ]
Reeves, Simon E. [1 ,5 ]
Ament, Judith M. [6 ]
Castro, Miguel [7 ]
Detmar, Sharie [8 ]
机构
[1] Nat Conservancy Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ South Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Environm Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Natl Ctr Coasts & Climate, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA
[7] Nature Conservancy, Quito, Ecuador
[8] Dept Environm & Water, Coast & Marine Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
natural climate solutions (NCS); GIS; carbon market; tidal marshes; mangroves; feasibility assessment; sea level rise; spatial modelling;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction: The emergence of voluntary carbon markets is creating new opportunities to sustainably finance Natural Climate Solution (NCS) projects. In Australia, the federal government recently enacted the Tidal Restoration of Blue Carbon Ecosystems Methodology Determination 2022 (Tidal Reconnection Method), whereby restoration activities that reintroduce tidal flows to allow the re-establishment of coastal wetland (blue carbon) ecosystems, through the removal or modification of a tidal restriction, can be used to gain and sell Australian carbon credit units. Australia has the highest net blue carbon wealth in the world, with 5%-11% of global carbon stocks, yet there is currently a lack of large-scale feasibility assessments and supporting methodologies to identify and prioritise sites with the greatest potential for NCS project implementation to help inform investment decisions. Methods: In this study, we applied a spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to identify, map, and prioritise potential sites for blue carbon coastal wetland restoration in South Australia that meet criteria outlined in the Tidal Reconnection Method. This study compared information on 1) predicted flooding extent following tidal reconnection and under sea level rise (SLR; present-day, 2050 and 2,100); 2) project implementation complexity (e.g. who possesses land tenure); and 3) carbon sequestration potential through predicted area of vegetation change under the above SLR scenarios. Results: Our results identified 64 sites of interest, of which 32 received an overall "high" prioritisation score of 3 or more out of 5. This equates to approximately 21,114 ha of high priority potential blue carbon restoration sites. Discussion: The MCDA enables development of a portfolio of viable restoration projects through a rapid "desktop" prioritisation of sites of interest, which can then guide investment in further detailed cost/benefit feasibility assessments. This study demonstrates an adaptable MCDA approach to map potential NCS projects at meaningful spatial scales and in-line with carbon market-based opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [22] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites
    Li, Jianbing
    Rahman, Mohammad Habibur
    Thring, Ronald Wallen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2010, 42 (1-3) : 220 - 239
  • [23] Multi-Criteria Decision Approach for Lightpath Restoration After Resource Crunch
    Santos, Alex S.
    Santos, Eonassis Oliveira
    Rahman, Sabidur
    Wosinska, Lena
    de Santi, Juliana
    Figueiredo, Gustavo B.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 21 (05): : 5521 - 5531
  • [24] Comparing normative and descriptive methods for multi-criteria decision analysis: A case study evaluating wetland restoration opportunities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA
    Martin, David M.
    Jacobs, Amy D.
    McLean, Chase
    Canick, Michelle R.
    Boomer, Kathleen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 132 : 142 - 152
  • [25] Residents' perception of flood risk and urban stream restoration using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Hong, Chang-Yu
    Chang, Heejun
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 36 (10) : 2078 - 2088
  • [26] A multi-Criteria Wetland Suitability Index for Restoration across Ontario's Mixedwood Plains
    Medland, Sally J.
    Shaker, Richard R.
    Forsythe, K. Wayne
    Mackay, Brian R.
    Rybarczyk, Greg
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 21
  • [27] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [28] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Identifying Potential Sites for Future Urban Development in Haridwar, India
    Tiwari, Anuj
    Tyagi, Deepak
    Sharma, Surendra Kumar
    Suresh, Merugu
    Jain, Kamal
    ICCCE 2018, 2019, 500 : 761 - 777
  • [29] IDENTIFYING SUITABLE SOLID WASTE LANDFILL SITES USING SPATIAL MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Hina S.M.
    Szmerekovsky J.
    Lee E.
    Amin M.
    Arooj S.
    Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 2022, 48 (02): : 196 - 207
  • [30] GIS Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Renewable Fnergy Sites Selection:Comparative Study
    Elmahmoudi, Fatma
    Abra, Oum Elkheir
    Serrar, Ouafae
    Raihani, Abdelhadi
    Bahatti, Lhousine
    Rafik, Mohamed
    2018 6TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC), 2018, : 482 - 488