Seas the opportunity: multi-criteria decision analysis to identify and prioritise blue carbon wetland restoration sites

被引:1
|
作者
Howie, Alice H. [1 ]
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Kondylas, Stella [1 ]
Russell, Sophie K. [3 ,4 ]
Reeves, Simon E. [1 ,5 ]
Ament, Judith M. [6 ]
Castro, Miguel [7 ]
Detmar, Sharie [8 ]
机构
[1] Nat Conservancy Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ South Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Environm Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Natl Ctr Coasts & Climate, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA
[7] Nature Conservancy, Quito, Ecuador
[8] Dept Environm & Water, Coast & Marine Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
natural climate solutions (NCS); GIS; carbon market; tidal marshes; mangroves; feasibility assessment; sea level rise; spatial modelling;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction: The emergence of voluntary carbon markets is creating new opportunities to sustainably finance Natural Climate Solution (NCS) projects. In Australia, the federal government recently enacted the Tidal Restoration of Blue Carbon Ecosystems Methodology Determination 2022 (Tidal Reconnection Method), whereby restoration activities that reintroduce tidal flows to allow the re-establishment of coastal wetland (blue carbon) ecosystems, through the removal or modification of a tidal restriction, can be used to gain and sell Australian carbon credit units. Australia has the highest net blue carbon wealth in the world, with 5%-11% of global carbon stocks, yet there is currently a lack of large-scale feasibility assessments and supporting methodologies to identify and prioritise sites with the greatest potential for NCS project implementation to help inform investment decisions. Methods: In this study, we applied a spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to identify, map, and prioritise potential sites for blue carbon coastal wetland restoration in South Australia that meet criteria outlined in the Tidal Reconnection Method. This study compared information on 1) predicted flooding extent following tidal reconnection and under sea level rise (SLR; present-day, 2050 and 2,100); 2) project implementation complexity (e.g. who possesses land tenure); and 3) carbon sequestration potential through predicted area of vegetation change under the above SLR scenarios. Results: Our results identified 64 sites of interest, of which 32 received an overall "high" prioritisation score of 3 or more out of 5. This equates to approximately 21,114 ha of high priority potential blue carbon restoration sites. Discussion: The MCDA enables development of a portfolio of viable restoration projects through a rapid "desktop" prioritisation of sites of interest, which can then guide investment in further detailed cost/benefit feasibility assessments. This study demonstrates an adaptable MCDA approach to map potential NCS projects at meaningful spatial scales and in-line with carbon market-based opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the Similarities of Some Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods
    Geldermann, Jutta
    Schoebel, Anita
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (3-4) : 219 - 230
  • [32] Multi-criteria decision analysis based on rough sets
    An, Li-Ping
    Chen, Zeng-Qiang
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2013, 28 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [33] Professor Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Hein, Nelson
    Kroenke, Adriana
    Rodrigues Junior, Moacir Manoel
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2015, 2015, 55 : 539 - 548
  • [34] The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Monat, Jamie P.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 4 (06): : 492 - 508
  • [35] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Nautical Anchorage Selection
    Pusic, Danijel
    Lusic, Zvonimir
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [36] Inclusion of Ethical Aspects in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Sapienza, Gaetana
    Dodig-Crnkovic, Gordana
    Crnkovic, Ivica
    PROCEEDINGS 2016 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DECISION MAKING IN SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE, 2016, : 1 - 8
  • [37] Mindsets, Rationality and Emotion in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Wenstop, Fred
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2005, 13 (04) : 161 - 172
  • [38] Raising the bar: strategic multi-criteria decision analysis
    Montibeller, G.
    Franco, L. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2011, 62 (05) : 855 - 867
  • [39] A MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION ALGORITHM FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
    Shi, Y.
    Van Gasse, B.
    Ruan, D.
    Kerre, E.
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL FLINS CONFERENCE, 2010, 4 : 832 - 837
  • [40] Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Liang, Jia-Ling
    Ho, Chun-Yen
    2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 901 - 906