Seas the opportunity: multi-criteria decision analysis to identify and prioritise blue carbon wetland restoration sites

被引:1
|
作者
Howie, Alice H. [1 ]
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Kondylas, Stella [1 ]
Russell, Sophie K. [3 ,4 ]
Reeves, Simon E. [1 ,5 ]
Ament, Judith M. [6 ]
Castro, Miguel [7 ]
Detmar, Sharie [8 ]
机构
[1] Nat Conservancy Australia, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ South Australia, Coll Sci & Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Environm Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Natl Ctr Coasts & Climate, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA USA
[7] Nature Conservancy, Quito, Ecuador
[8] Dept Environm & Water, Coast & Marine Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
natural climate solutions (NCS); GIS; carbon market; tidal marshes; mangroves; feasibility assessment; sea level rise; spatial modelling;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction: The emergence of voluntary carbon markets is creating new opportunities to sustainably finance Natural Climate Solution (NCS) projects. In Australia, the federal government recently enacted the Tidal Restoration of Blue Carbon Ecosystems Methodology Determination 2022 (Tidal Reconnection Method), whereby restoration activities that reintroduce tidal flows to allow the re-establishment of coastal wetland (blue carbon) ecosystems, through the removal or modification of a tidal restriction, can be used to gain and sell Australian carbon credit units. Australia has the highest net blue carbon wealth in the world, with 5%-11% of global carbon stocks, yet there is currently a lack of large-scale feasibility assessments and supporting methodologies to identify and prioritise sites with the greatest potential for NCS project implementation to help inform investment decisions. Methods: In this study, we applied a spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to identify, map, and prioritise potential sites for blue carbon coastal wetland restoration in South Australia that meet criteria outlined in the Tidal Reconnection Method. This study compared information on 1) predicted flooding extent following tidal reconnection and under sea level rise (SLR; present-day, 2050 and 2,100); 2) project implementation complexity (e.g. who possesses land tenure); and 3) carbon sequestration potential through predicted area of vegetation change under the above SLR scenarios. Results: Our results identified 64 sites of interest, of which 32 received an overall "high" prioritisation score of 3 or more out of 5. This equates to approximately 21,114 ha of high priority potential blue carbon restoration sites. Discussion: The MCDA enables development of a portfolio of viable restoration projects through a rapid "desktop" prioritisation of sites of interest, which can then guide investment in further detailed cost/benefit feasibility assessments. This study demonstrates an adaptable MCDA approach to map potential NCS projects at meaningful spatial scales and in-line with carbon market-based opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A decision support tool to help identify blue carbon sites for restoration
    Nuyts, Siegmund
    Costa, Micheli Duarte de Paula
    Macreadie, Peter I.
    Trevathan-Tackett, Stacey M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 367
  • [2] Applying multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritise age-friendly criteria for policy implications
    Raut, Sashi Bhusan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 15 (01) : 250 - 266
  • [3] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Identify Global and Local Importance Weights of Decision Criteria
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej
    Paradowski, Bartosz
    Shekhovtsov, Andrii
    Salabun, Wojciech
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (06) : 1867 - 1892
  • [4] Framework for multi-criteria decision management in watershed restoration
    Udias, Angel
    Galbiati, Lorenzo
    Javier Elorza, Francisco
    Efremov, Roman
    Pons, Jordi
    Borras, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2012, 14 (02) : 395 - 411
  • [5] Use of multi-criteria decision analysis to identify potentially dangerous glacial lakes
    Kougkoulos, Ioannis
    Cook, Simon J.
    Jomelli, Vincent
    Clarke, Leon
    Symeonakis, Elias
    Dortch, Jason M.
    Edwards, Laura A.
    Merad, Myriam
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 621 : 1453 - 1466
  • [6] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829
  • [7] Evaluation of ecotourism sites: a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis
    Cetinkaya, Cihan
    Kabak, Mehmet
    Erbas, Mehmet
    Ozceylan, Eren
    KYBERNETES, 2018, 47 (08) : 1664 - 1686
  • [8] A multi-criteria decision making approach to identify a vaccine formulation
    Dewe, Walthere
    Durand, Christelle
    Marion, Sandie
    Oostvogels, Lidia
    Devaster, Jeanne-Marie
    Fourneau, Marc
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 26 (02) : 352 - 364
  • [9] Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites
    Linkov, I
    Varghese, A
    Jamil, S
    Seager, TP
    Kiker, G
    Bridges, T
    COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 38 : 15 - 54
  • [10] A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Identify Measurement Instruments
    Wang, Dali
    Rieflin, Elliot
    Chen, Gao
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (CIVEMSA), 2016, : 78 - 82