Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Zuojuan [1 ]
Ma, Ling [2 ]
Fu, Yingzhou [1 ]
Pan, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Peoples Hosp Yunnan Prov 1, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
cost-effectiveness; sintilimab; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer; partitioned survival approach; OPEN-LABEL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1411571
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated. Methods: We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis. Results: In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS >= 5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame. Conclusion: In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a real-world retrospective study
    Xu, Qian
    Yi, Dan
    Jia, Caiyan
    Kong, Fanming
    Jia, Yingjie
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab vs. Placebo Added to Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China
    Zhang, Qilin
    Wu, Pan
    He, Xucheng
    Ding, Yufeng
    Shu, Yamin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC: Evidence from China
    Dai, Hongbin
    Wang, Wenyue
    Fan, Xin
    Chen, Yongfa
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [44] Correction: Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer in China
    Huiqin Liu
    Ying Wang
    Qi He
    Health Economics Review, 13
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China
    Liu, Huiqin
    Wang, Ying
    He, Qi
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [46] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs. Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hu, Huabin
    She, Longjiang
    Liao, Mengting
    Shi, Yin
    Yao, Linli
    Ding, Dong
    Zhu, Youwen
    Zeng, Shan
    Carbone, David P.
    Huang, Jin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in China
    Chen, Xin-Zu
    Jiang, Kun
    Hu, Jian-Kun
    Zhang, Bo
    Gou, Hong-Feng
    Yang, Kun
    Chen, Zhi-Xin
    Chen, Lia-Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (17) : 2715 - 2722
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    You, Maojin
    Huang, Yufan
    Cai, Zhongjie
    Wu, Qingfeng
    Zhu, Wei
    He, Ying
    Chen, Ruijia
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [49] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FIRST-LINE NIVOLUMAB COMBINATION THERAPY VS CHEMOTHERAPY ALONE FOR ADVANCED OR METASTATIC ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
    Ben-Umeh, K.
    Okoye, G.
    Malone, D. C.
    King, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S87 - S88
  • [50] First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal adenocarcinoma: CheckMate 649 Chinese subgroup analysis
    Liu, Tianshu
    Bai, Yuxian
    Lin, Xiaoyan
    Li, Wei
    Wang, Jufeng
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Pan, Hongming
    Bai, Chunmei
    Bai, Li
    Cheng, Ying
    Zhang, Jingdong
    Zhong, Haijun
    Ba, Yi
    Hu, Wenwei
    Xu, Ruihua
    Guo, Weijian
    Qin, Shukui
    Yang, Nong
    Lu, Jianwei
    Shitara, Kohei
    Lei, Ming
    Li, Mingshun
    Bao, Nicole
    Chen, Tian
    Shen, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 152 (04) : 749 - 760