Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Zuojuan [1 ]
Ma, Ling [2 ]
Fu, Yingzhou [1 ]
Pan, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Peoples Hosp Yunnan Prov 1, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
cost-effectiveness; sintilimab; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer; partitioned survival approach; OPEN-LABEL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1411571
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated. Methods: We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis. Results: In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS >= 5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame. Conclusion: In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of first-line metastatic NSCLC in China
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Li
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Wang, Hao-Lun
    Wang, Ying-Yuan
    Chen, Ze-Chang
    Zhou, Qin
    Li, Xiang-Ping
    Zhang, Ying-Ying
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05): : 6182 - 6189
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer
    Pei, Zhengda
    Xiao, Ningping
    Yang, Pei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma from a Chinese perspective
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Li
    Zhang, Jiangyan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 18 (06) : 293 - 301
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Gong, Jinhong
    Shang, Jingjing
    Su, Dan
    Qian, Xiaodan
    Liu, Guangjun
    Sun, Zhiqiang
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (06) : 709 - 717
  • [26] Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma
    Xu, Rui-hua
    Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Denlinger, Crystal S.
    Kato, Ken
    Tabernero, Josep
    Wang, Jin
    Li, Jiang
    Castro, Henry
    Moehler, Markus H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04)
  • [27] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zhu, Youwen
    Liu, Kun
    Ding, Dong
    Zhou, Yangying
    Peng, Libo
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (06) : 2614 - 2629
  • [28] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Youwen Zhu
    Kun Liu
    Dong Ding
    Yangying Zhou
    Libo Peng
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 2614 - 2629
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Shuxia Qin
    Lidan Yi
    Sini Li
    Chongqing Tan
    Xiaohui Zeng
    Liting Wang
    Ye Peng
    Xiaomin Wan
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 3399 - 3408
  • [30] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Qin, Shuxia
    Yi, Lidan
    Li, Sini
    Tan, Chongqing
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Wang, Liting
    Peng, Ye
    Wan, Xiaomin
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (06) : 3399 - 3408