Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Zuojuan [1 ]
Ma, Ling [2 ]
Fu, Yingzhou [1 ]
Pan, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Peoples Hosp Yunnan Prov 1, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
cost-effectiveness; sintilimab; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer; partitioned survival approach; OPEN-LABEL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1411571
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated. Methods: We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis. Results: In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS >= 5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame. Conclusion: In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Lang, Yitian
    Liao, Yahui
    Zhu, Yizhun
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer in China
    Huiqin Liu
    Ying Wang
    Qi He
    Health Economics Review, 12
  • [33] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Oesophageal Cancer
    Wu, Meiyu
    Qin, Shuxia
    Wang, Liting
    Tan, Chongqing
    Peng, Ye
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Luo, Xia
    Yi, Lidan
    Wan, Xiaomin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced squamous NSCLC in China
    Shao, Taihang
    Ren, Yinan
    Zhao, Mingye
    Tang, Wenxi
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [35] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NIVOLUMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY VS CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER IN JAPAN
    Morimoto, K.
    Moriwaki, K.
    Shimozuma, K.
    Nakayama, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S505 - S505
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Fang, Ling
    Cai, Hongfu
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China
    Zhiwei Zheng
    Ling Fang
    Hongfu Cai
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [38] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China
    Zhou, Chongchong
    Wei, Jingxuan
    Xu, Kai
    Lin, Yingtao
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Xin
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2023, 16 : 2447 - 2458
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China
    Liu, Yanhong
    Shao, Rong
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China
    He, Chaoneng
    Mi, Xiufang
    Xu, Gaoqi
    Xu, Xinglu
    Xin, Wenxiu
    Zhong, Like
    Zhu, Junfeng
    Shu, Qi
    Fang, Luo
    Ding, Haiying
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):