Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Zuojuan [1 ]
Ma, Ling [2 ]
Fu, Yingzhou [1 ]
Pan, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Peoples Hosp Yunnan Prov 1, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
cost-effectiveness; sintilimab; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer; partitioned survival approach; OPEN-LABEL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1411571
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated. Methods: We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis. Results: In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS >= 5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame. Conclusion: In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-utility of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Li
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (05) : 671 - 678
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer/Esophagel Adenocarcinoma in China
    Shu, Yamin
    Ding, Yufeng
    Zhang, Qilin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Jiang, Yuan
    Li, Yue
    Wang, Larry X. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (02) : 499 - 506
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Yuan Jiang
    Yue Li
    Larry X. W. Wang
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 499 - 506
  • [5] First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cao, Xueqiong
    Zhang, Mingming
    Li, Na
    Zheng, Bin
    Liu, Maobai
    Song, Xiaobing
    Cai, Hongfu
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [6] Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Peng-Fei Zhang
    Xuan-Qiong Shi
    Qiu Li
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 21
  • [7] Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Shi, Xuan-Qiong
    Li, Qiu
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma in China
    Lin, Nanlong
    Chen, Shiting
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Song, Xiaobing
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [9] Comparative cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer
    Lin, Ying-tao
    Wang, Chang
    He, Xiao-yan
    Yao, Qi-min
    Chen, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Zeng, Fan-Yuan
    Tang, Zi-Qing
    Zhou, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13