Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haotian [1 ]
Zhi, Juan [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zibin [1 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
Xing, Fei [1 ]
Wen, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qianyu [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Li, Weiou [1 ]
Xu, Ermeng [1 ]
An, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Badachu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
esketamine; sedation; analgesia; satisfaction; liposuction; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; KETAMINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; DEPRESSION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S470891
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 +/- 0.6 vs 4.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3645 / 3658
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can low dose of intratracheal dexmedetomidine be used to attenuate peri-extubation cough?-A prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
    Nahar, Afreen
    Gopinath, V
    Ruth, Merlin
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 17 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [42] The Prophylactic Use of Remifentanil for Delayed Extubation After Elective Intracranial Operations: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial
    Wu, Yuan-Xing
    Chen, Han
    Li, Qian
    Hao, Jing-Jing
    Zhao, Li-Hong
    He, Xuan
    Sun, Xiu-Mei
    Xu, Ming
    Zhou, Jian-Xin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 281 - 290
  • [43] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index controlled anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blinded study
    Jain, Kavita
    Sethi, Surendra Kumar
    Harsha, K. N.
    Patodi, Veena
    Jain, Neena
    Meena, Deepika
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [44] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in attenuating pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation under bispectral index controlled anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blinded study
    Kavita Jain
    Surendra Kumar Sethi
    Harsha K.N.
    Veena Patodi
    Neena Jain
    Deepika Meena
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 15
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zheng, Longbin
    Wang, Yiteng
    Ma, Qing
    Liang, Wenbo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Qin, Weimin
    Meng, Fan
    Li, Yuhong
    Fan, Guoxiang
    Yin, Ning
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1347 - 1356
  • [46] Comparison of the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block: prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Ghazaly, Huda F.
    Aly, Ahmed Alsaied A.
    Zaher, Zaher Zaki
    Hassan, Mahmoud M.
    Mahmoud, Ahmed Abdelreheem
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [47] Comparison of the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block: prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Huda F. Ghazaly
    Ahmed Alsaied A. Aly
    Zaher Zaki Zaher
    Mahmoud M. Hassan
    Ahmed Abdelreheem Mahmoud
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [48] Pentoxifylline Improves Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Results of a Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Zein, Claudia
    Gogate, Prema
    Yerian, Lisa
    Kirwan, John
    McCullough, Arthur
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S114 - S114
  • [49] GRADUAL WITHDRAWAL OF REMIFENTANIL TCI DELAYS FIRST POST-OPERATIVE ANALGESIC DEMAND AFTER THYROID SURGERY: A DOUBLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Saxena, Sarah
    Gonsette, Kimberly
    Terram, Willy
    Huybrechts, Isabelle
    Cappello, Matteo
    Barvais, Luc
    Engelman, Edgard
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 126 (04): : 623 - 624
  • [50] INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS ORAL MIDAZOLAM FOR PREMEDICATION IN PEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLINDED RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Yadav, S.
    Ramdas, E.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 354 - 354