Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haotian [1 ]
Zhi, Juan [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zibin [1 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
Xing, Fei [1 ]
Wen, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qianyu [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Li, Weiou [1 ]
Xu, Ermeng [1 ]
An, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Badachu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
esketamine; sedation; analgesia; satisfaction; liposuction; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; KETAMINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; DEPRESSION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S470891
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 +/- 0.6 vs 4.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3645 / 3658
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
    Kim, Ha Yeon
    Kwak, Hyun Jeong
    Lee, Dongchul
    Lee, Ji Hyea
    Min, Sang Kee
    Kim, Jong Yeop
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [32] Nebulized vs. oral midazolam as a sedative premedication in pediatric anesthesia: A randomized controlled double-blinded study
    Soaida, Sherif Mohamed
    Hafez, Mohamed EL-Saied
    Girgis, Karim Kamal
    Marie, Mohamed Mahmoud
    Selim, Mohamed Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 38 (01): : 476 - 482
  • [33] Gradual withdrawal of remifentanil delays initial post-operative analgesic demand after thyroid surgery; double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Saxena, Sarah
    Gonsette, Kimberly
    Terram, Willy
    Huybrechts, Isabelle
    Nahrwold, Daniel A.
    Cappello, Matteo
    Barvais, Luc
    Engelman, Edgard
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [34] Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided preoperative posterior Quadratus Lumborum block in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Seungwon
    Ko, Justin Sangwook
    Kang, Ryung A.
    Choi, Gyu-Seong
    Kim, Jong Man
    Gwak, Mi Sook
    Shin, Young Hee
    Lee, Sangmin Maria
    Kim, Gaab Soo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 97
  • [35] A prospective, randomized, double-blinded control study on comparison of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine for post spinal anesthesia shivering
    Venkatraman, Rajagopalan
    Karthik, Krishnamoorthy
    Pushparani, Anand
    Mahalakshmi, Annadurai
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (01): : 42 - 48
  • [36] Gradual withdrawal of remifentanil delays initial post-operative analgesic demand after thyroid surgery; double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Sarah Saxena
    Kimberly Gonsette
    Willy Terram
    Isabelle Huybrechts
    Daniel A. Nahrwold
    Matteo Cappello
    Luc Barvais
    Edgard Engelman
    BMC Anesthesiology, 19
  • [37] Evaluating efficacy and safety of sub-anesthetic dose esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol/remifentanil analgosedation and spontaneous respiration for children flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Zhong, Yu
    Jiang, Min
    Wang, Yunshi
    Su, Tingting
    Lv, Yuanzhi
    Fan, Zhiqing
    Ning, Hengyi
    Yang, Yilan
    Chen, Yanhua
    Xie, Yubo
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [38] Optimal Dose of Pituitrin in Laparoscopic Uterine Myomectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Guo, Feihe
    Jiao, Cuicui
    Xu, Kaihong
    Yang, Chunbo
    Huang, Xiadi
    Lu, Yongchao
    Xu, Lili
    Chen, Xinzhong
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 2073 - 2079
  • [39] Effect of esketamine on postpartum depression after labor analgesia and potential mechanisms: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
    Wang, Wei
    Ling, Bin
    Zhao, Haibo
    He, Jing
    Xu, Hua
    Lv, Jie
    Wang, Qi
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [40] A randomized double-blinded controlled trial on the effects of photobiomodulation therapy in dogs with osteoarthritis
    Alves, Joao C.
    Santos, Ana
    Jorge, Patricia
    Carreira, L. Miguel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 83 (08)