Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haotian [1 ]
Zhi, Juan [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zibin [1 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
Xing, Fei [1 ]
Wen, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qianyu [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Li, Weiou [1 ]
Xu, Ermeng [1 ]
An, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Badachu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
esketamine; sedation; analgesia; satisfaction; liposuction; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; KETAMINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; DEPRESSION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S470891
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 +/- 0.6 vs 4.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3645 / 3658
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on perioperative hemodynamics and recovery profile of patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery A prospective randomized double-blinded study
    Kim, Young Sung
    Chang, Hae Wone
    Kim, Heezoo
    Park, Jong Sun
    Won, Young Ju
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (34) : E27045
  • [22] Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in saddle anesthesia for anoplasty: a correlative randomized double-blinded trial
    Seyam, Sameh Hamdy Abdelhamid
    Abdelgawad, Ismail Mohamed
    Abdelhalim, Mohamed Abdelgawad
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (02) : 302 - 309
  • [23] Analgesic effectiveness of rectus sheath block during open gastrectomy A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial
    Hong, Seongwook
    Kim, Hyunjeong
    Park, Junmo
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (15)
  • [24] The Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesic Requirement After Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rajan, Shobana
    Hutcherson, Matthew T.
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Kurz, Andrea
    Yang, Dongsheng
    Ghobrial, Michael
    Liu, Jinbo
    Avitsian, Rafi
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) : 282 - 290
  • [25] ADV6209 for Premedication in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zadrazil, Markus
    Marhofer, Peter
    Schmid, Werner
    Marhofer, Daniela
    Opfermann, Philipp
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [26] Commentary on: The Combined Effect of Intravenous and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Liposuction: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial
    Couto, Rafael A.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2021, 3 (01):
  • [27] Intrathecal dexmedetomidine can decrease the 95% effective dose of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section A prospective, double-blinded, randomized study
    Liu, Lin
    Qian, Jing
    Shen, Bei
    Xiao, Fei
    Shen, Huaxiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (09)
  • [28] Comparison of effects of ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine in axillary brachial plexus block: A prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial
    Bangera, Ananda
    Manasa, Mukka
    Krishna, Prasad
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 10 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [29] Comparison of remifentanil concentrations with and without dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence cough after nasal surgery: a randomized double-blinded trial
    Ha Yeon Kim
    Hyun Jeong Kwak
    Dongchul Lee
    Ji Hyea Lee
    Sang Kee Min
    Jong Yeop Kim
    BMC Anesthesiology, 21
  • [30] Comparison of midazolam and low-dose dexmedetomidine in flexible bronchoscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
    Magazine, Rahul
    Venkatachala, Shivaraj
    Goneppanavar, Umesh
    Surendra, Vyshak Uddur
    Guddattu, Vasudeva
    Chogtu, Bharti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) : 23 - 30