Evolution of phenotypic plasticity leads to tumor heterogeneity with implications for therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Syga, Simon [1 ]
Jain, Harish P. [2 ]
Krellner, Marcus [3 ]
Hatzikirou, Haralampos [1 ,4 ]
Deutsch, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] TUD Dresden Univ Technol, Ctr Interdisciplinary Digital Sci, Dept Informat Serv & High Performance Comp, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Oslo, Njord Ctr, Dept Phys, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ St Andrews, Sch Math & Stat, St Andrews, Scotland
[4] Khalifa Univ, Math Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CANCER; INVASION; HALLMARKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cancer is a significant global health issue, with treatment challenges arising from intratumor heterogeneity. This heterogeneity stems mainly from somatic evolution, causing genetic diversity within the tumor, and phenotypic plasticity of tumor cells leading to reversible phenotypic changes. However, the interplay of both factors has not been rigorously investigated. Here, we examine the complex relationship between somatic evolution and phenotypic plasticity, explicitly focusing on the interplay between cell migration and proliferation. This type of phenotypic plasticity is essential in glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. We propose that somatic evolution alters the regulation of phenotypic plasticity in tumor cells, specifically the reaction to changes in the microenvironment. We study this hypothesis using a novel, spatially explicit model that tracks individual cells' phenotypic and genetic states. We assume cells change between migratory and proliferative states controlled by inherited and mutation-driven genotypes and the cells' microenvironment. We observe that cells at the tumor edge evolve to favor migration over proliferation and vice versa in the tumor bulk. Notably, different genetic configurations can result in this pattern of phenotypic heterogeneity. We analytically predict the outcome of the evolutionary process, showing that it depends on the tumor microenvironment. Synthetic tumors display varying levels of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which we show are predictors of tumor recurrence time after treatment. Interestingly, higher phenotypic heterogeneity predicts poor treatment outcomes, unlike genetic heterogeneity. Our research offers a novel explanation for heterogeneous patterns of tumor recurrence in glioblastoma patients. Intratumor heterogeneity presents a significant barrier to effective cancer therapy. This heterogeneity stems from the evolution of cancer cells and their capability for phenotypic plasticity. However, the interplay between these two factors still needs to be fully understood. This study examines the interaction between cancer cell evolution and phenotypic plasticity, focusing on the phenotypic switch between migration and proliferation. Such plasticity is particularly relevant to glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. By employing a novel model, we explore how tumor cell evolution, influenced by both genotype and microenvironment, contributes to tumor heterogeneity. We observe that cells at the tumor periphery tend to migrate, while those within the tumor are more inclined to proliferate. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that distinct genetic configurations of the tumor can lead to this observed pattern. Further, we delve into the implications for cancer treatment and discover that it is phenotypic, rather than genetic, heterogeneity that more accurately predicts tumor recurrence following therapy. Our findings offer insights into the significant variability observed in glioblastoma recurrence times post-treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in fish swimming
    Oufiero, Christopher E.
    Whitlow, Katrina R.
    CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2016, 62 (05) : 475 - 488
  • [42] AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE ROLE OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN EVOLUTION
    BEHERA, N
    NANJUNDIAH, V
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1995, 172 (03) : 225 - 234
  • [43] New frontiers in phenotypic plasticity and evolution
    Hollander, J.
    Snell-Rood, E.
    Foster, S.
    HEREDITY, 2015, 115 (04) : 273 - 275
  • [44] Phenotypic noise and plasticity in cancer evolution
    Whiting, Frederick J. H.
    Househam, Jacob
    Baker, Ann-Marie
    Sottoriva, Andrea
    Graham, Trevor A.
    TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06) : 451 - 464
  • [45] New frontiers in phenotypic plasticity and evolution
    J Hollander
    E Snell-Rood
    S Foster
    Heredity, 2015, 115 : 273 - 275
  • [46] Phenotypic plasticity as a facilitator of microbial evolution
    Santiago, Emerson
    Moreno, David F.
    Acar, Murat
    ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENETICS, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [47] MODELS OF THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY - REPLY
    THOMPSON, JD
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1992, 7 (02) : 64 - 64
  • [48] Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments
    Chevin, Luis-Miguel
    Hoffmann, Ary A.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 372 (1723)
  • [49] Amphibious fishes: evolution and phenotypic plasticity
    Wright, Patricia A.
    Turko, Andy J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 219 (15): : 2245 - 2259
  • [50] Comprehending phenotypic plasticity in cancer and evolution
    Kulkarni, Prakash
    Salgia, Ravi
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (03)