Evolution of phenotypic plasticity leads to tumor heterogeneity with implications for therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Syga, Simon [1 ]
Jain, Harish P. [2 ]
Krellner, Marcus [3 ]
Hatzikirou, Haralampos [1 ,4 ]
Deutsch, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] TUD Dresden Univ Technol, Ctr Interdisciplinary Digital Sci, Dept Informat Serv & High Performance Comp, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Oslo, Njord Ctr, Dept Phys, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ St Andrews, Sch Math & Stat, St Andrews, Scotland
[4] Khalifa Univ, Math Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CANCER; INVASION; HALLMARKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cancer is a significant global health issue, with treatment challenges arising from intratumor heterogeneity. This heterogeneity stems mainly from somatic evolution, causing genetic diversity within the tumor, and phenotypic plasticity of tumor cells leading to reversible phenotypic changes. However, the interplay of both factors has not been rigorously investigated. Here, we examine the complex relationship between somatic evolution and phenotypic plasticity, explicitly focusing on the interplay between cell migration and proliferation. This type of phenotypic plasticity is essential in glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. We propose that somatic evolution alters the regulation of phenotypic plasticity in tumor cells, specifically the reaction to changes in the microenvironment. We study this hypothesis using a novel, spatially explicit model that tracks individual cells' phenotypic and genetic states. We assume cells change between migratory and proliferative states controlled by inherited and mutation-driven genotypes and the cells' microenvironment. We observe that cells at the tumor edge evolve to favor migration over proliferation and vice versa in the tumor bulk. Notably, different genetic configurations can result in this pattern of phenotypic heterogeneity. We analytically predict the outcome of the evolutionary process, showing that it depends on the tumor microenvironment. Synthetic tumors display varying levels of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which we show are predictors of tumor recurrence time after treatment. Interestingly, higher phenotypic heterogeneity predicts poor treatment outcomes, unlike genetic heterogeneity. Our research offers a novel explanation for heterogeneous patterns of tumor recurrence in glioblastoma patients. Intratumor heterogeneity presents a significant barrier to effective cancer therapy. This heterogeneity stems from the evolution of cancer cells and their capability for phenotypic plasticity. However, the interplay between these two factors still needs to be fully understood. This study examines the interaction between cancer cell evolution and phenotypic plasticity, focusing on the phenotypic switch between migration and proliferation. Such plasticity is particularly relevant to glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. By employing a novel model, we explore how tumor cell evolution, influenced by both genotype and microenvironment, contributes to tumor heterogeneity. We observe that cells at the tumor periphery tend to migrate, while those within the tumor are more inclined to proliferate. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that distinct genetic configurations of the tumor can lead to this observed pattern. Further, we delve into the implications for cancer treatment and discover that it is phenotypic, rather than genetic, heterogeneity that more accurately predicts tumor recurrence following therapy. Our findings offer insights into the significant variability observed in glioblastoma recurrence times post-treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Notch Pathway to Elucidate Phenotypic Plasticity and Intra-tumor Heterogeneity in Gliomas
    Chowdhury, Saikat
    Sarkar, Ram Rup
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [22] Drivers of dynamic intratumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity
    Biswas, Antara
    De, Subhajyoti
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 320 (05): : C750 - C760
  • [23] PHENOTYPIC HETEROGENEITY AND PLASTICITY AS RESISTANCE MECHANISMS IN GLIOBLASTOMA
    Yabo, Y. Y.
    Oudin, A.
    Skupin, A.
    Nazarov, P. V.
    Niclou, S. P.
    Golebiewska, A.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 : 1 - 1
  • [24] Phenotypic heterogeneity and evolution of melanoma cells associated with targeted therapy resistance
    Su, Yapeng
    Bintz, Marcus
    Yang, Yezi
    Robert, Lidia
    Ng, Alphonsus H. C.
    Liu, Victoria
    Ribas, Antoni
    Heath, James R.
    Wei, Wei
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 15 (06)
  • [25] The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics
    Ernande, B
    Dieckmann, U
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2004, 17 (03) : 613 - 628
  • [26] Phenotypic heterogeneity and evolution of melanoma cells associated with targeted therapy resistance
    Su, Yapeng
    Bintz, Marcus
    Yang, Yezi
    Robert, Lidia
    Ng, Alphonsus H. C.
    Liud, Victoria
    Ribas, Antoni
    Heath, James R.
    Wei, Wei
    PLoS Computational Biology, 2019, 15 (06):
  • [27] Microenvironment-Driven Dynamic Heterogeneity and Phenotypic Plasticity as a Mechanism of Melanoma Therapy Resistance
    Ahmed, Farzana
    Haass, Nikolas K.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [28] Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes
    de Jong, G
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2005, 166 (01) : 101 - 117
  • [29] Tackling tumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity in cancer precision medicine: our experience and a literature review
    Sheng, Shijie
    Bernardo, M. Margarida
    Dzinic, Sijana H.
    Chen, Kang
    Heath, Elisabeth I.
    Sakr, Wael A.
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2018, 37 (04) : 655 - 663
  • [30] Phenotypic Heterogeneity, Bidirectionality, Universal Cues, Plasticity, Mechanics, and the Tumor Microenvironment Drive Cancer Metastasis
    Mierke, Claudia Tanja
    BIOMOLECULES, 2024, 14 (02)