Evolution of phenotypic plasticity leads to tumor heterogeneity with implications for therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Syga, Simon [1 ]
Jain, Harish P. [2 ]
Krellner, Marcus [3 ]
Hatzikirou, Haralampos [1 ,4 ]
Deutsch, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] TUD Dresden Univ Technol, Ctr Interdisciplinary Digital Sci, Dept Informat Serv & High Performance Comp, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Oslo, Njord Ctr, Dept Phys, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ St Andrews, Sch Math & Stat, St Andrews, Scotland
[4] Khalifa Univ, Math Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CANCER; INVASION; HALLMARKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cancer is a significant global health issue, with treatment challenges arising from intratumor heterogeneity. This heterogeneity stems mainly from somatic evolution, causing genetic diversity within the tumor, and phenotypic plasticity of tumor cells leading to reversible phenotypic changes. However, the interplay of both factors has not been rigorously investigated. Here, we examine the complex relationship between somatic evolution and phenotypic plasticity, explicitly focusing on the interplay between cell migration and proliferation. This type of phenotypic plasticity is essential in glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. We propose that somatic evolution alters the regulation of phenotypic plasticity in tumor cells, specifically the reaction to changes in the microenvironment. We study this hypothesis using a novel, spatially explicit model that tracks individual cells' phenotypic and genetic states. We assume cells change between migratory and proliferative states controlled by inherited and mutation-driven genotypes and the cells' microenvironment. We observe that cells at the tumor edge evolve to favor migration over proliferation and vice versa in the tumor bulk. Notably, different genetic configurations can result in this pattern of phenotypic heterogeneity. We analytically predict the outcome of the evolutionary process, showing that it depends on the tumor microenvironment. Synthetic tumors display varying levels of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, which we show are predictors of tumor recurrence time after treatment. Interestingly, higher phenotypic heterogeneity predicts poor treatment outcomes, unlike genetic heterogeneity. Our research offers a novel explanation for heterogeneous patterns of tumor recurrence in glioblastoma patients. Intratumor heterogeneity presents a significant barrier to effective cancer therapy. This heterogeneity stems from the evolution of cancer cells and their capability for phenotypic plasticity. However, the interplay between these two factors still needs to be fully understood. This study examines the interaction between cancer cell evolution and phenotypic plasticity, focusing on the phenotypic switch between migration and proliferation. Such plasticity is particularly relevant to glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor. By employing a novel model, we explore how tumor cell evolution, influenced by both genotype and microenvironment, contributes to tumor heterogeneity. We observe that cells at the tumor periphery tend to migrate, while those within the tumor are more inclined to proliferate. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that distinct genetic configurations of the tumor can lead to this observed pattern. Further, we delve into the implications for cancer treatment and discover that it is phenotypic, rather than genetic, heterogeneity that more accurately predicts tumor recurrence following therapy. Our findings offer insights into the significant variability observed in glioblastoma recurrence times post-treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tackling tumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity in cancer precision medicine: our experience and a literature review
    Shijie Sheng
    M. Margarida Bernardo
    Sijana H. Dzinic
    Kang Chen
    Elisabeth I. Heath
    Wael A. Sakr
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2018, 37 : 655 - 663
  • [32] Phenotypic plasticity - Implications for tumours in bone
    Han, Yujiao
    Kang, Yibin
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 45
  • [33] EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN PLANTS
    SULTAN, SE
    EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-NEW YORK, 1987, 21 : 127 - 178
  • [34] Tumor Heterogeneity, Clonal Evolution, and Therapy Resistance: An Opportunity for Multitargeting Therapy
    Calderwood, Stuart K.
    DISCOVERY MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (82) : 188 - 194
  • [35] Evolution of environmental cues for phenotypic plasticity
    Chevin, Luis-Miguel
    Lande, Russell
    EVOLUTION, 2015, 69 (10) : 2767 - 2775
  • [36] Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation
    Pigliucci, Massimo
    Murren, Courtney J.
    Schlichting, Carl D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (12): : 2362 - 2367
  • [37] A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism
    Sword, GA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 269 (1501) : 1639 - 1644
  • [38] Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in colonizing species
    Lande, Russell
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2015, 24 (09) : 2038 - 2045
  • [39] Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation
    Nanjundiah, V
    ORIGINATION OF ORGANISMAL FORM: BEYOND THE GENE IN DEVELOPMENTAL AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, : 245 - 263
  • [40] Assessing the Impacts of Phenotypic Plasticity on Evolution
    Wund, Matthew A.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 52 (01) : 5 - 15