Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

被引:2
|
作者
Hagger, Valerie [1 ]
Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe [2 ]
Rossini, Renee Anne [1 ]
Adame, Maria Fernanda [3 ]
Glamore, William [4 ]
Lavery, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Waltham, Nathan J. [7 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Atmospher Res Ltd, Natl Inst Water, Dept Marine Ecol, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Ctr Marine & Coastal Res, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Water Res Lab, Manly Vale, NSW, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Marine Ecosyst Res, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MANGROVE; MARSH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse types of saline coastal wetlands contribute significantly to global biodiversity, carbon stocks, and ecosystem functions. Opportunities to incentivise coastal wetland restoration from carbon markets is growing across the world. However, little is known of the economic feasibility of blue carbon restoration across different regions, or the quantities of ecological and social co-benefits that accompany restoration. We explored the opportunities for tidal restoration of coastal wetlands for blue carbon projects in three regions across Australia. We identified biophysically suitable potential restoration sites for mangroves, saltmarshes and supratidal forests, estimated their carbon abatement over 25 years, and undertook a cost-benefit analysis under the carbon market. Potential co-benefits of restoration sites for biodiversity, fisheries, water quality and coastal protection were measured to identify economically feasible sites that maximise the provision of co-benefits. Cultural benefits were identified as the potential for leadership and collaboration by Traditional Custodians at sites. We found that the extent of restoration opportunities varied among regions, with variation in tidal range, extent of agricultural land-use, and the type of hydrological modifications influencing carbon abatement forecasts. The presence of threatened species in hydrologically modified wetlands reduced the amount of land available for restoration, however the restoration of remaining areas could produce rich ecological and cultural benefits. A high carbon price was needed to make blue carbon restoration profitable on land used for beef production. We found sites where carbon credits can be bundled with co-benefits to possibly attain higher carbon prices. Traditional Custodians were interested in leading blue carbon projects, however the opportunity is dependent on Native Title rights. Through comparison of case studies, we developed a regional approach to identify coastal wetland restoration sites for blue carbon and co-benefits that can incorporate local knowledge and data availability, engage with Traditional Custodians, and adapt to the unique characteristics of regions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial optimization of carbon-stocking projects across Africa integrating stocking potential with co-benefits and feasibility
    Greve, Michelle
    Reyers, Belinda
    Lykke, Anne Mette
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 4
  • [42] Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey
    Tolunay, Ahmet
    Bassullu, Caglar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (03) : 3311 - 3337
  • [43] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Harmsen, Mathijs J. H. M.
    van Dorst, Pim
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    van den Berg, Maarten
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1519 - 1538
  • [44] An assessment of the effect of abandoned coastal wetland restoration in China-Achievements and lessons
    Xie, Zhenglei
    Du, Zebing
    Zhang, Hezi
    Xiang, Lixiong
    Wu, Yuli
    Jiang, Yinghui
    Zhao, Xiaoxiang
    Li, Shimei
    Yang, Xiaoyang
    Shan, Kai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2015, 2015, 31 : 544 - 559
  • [45] Partnerships Generate Co-Benefits in Agricultural Stream Restoration (Canterbury, New Zealand)
    Febria, Catherine M.
    Bayfield, Maggie
    Collins, Kathryn E.
    Devlin, Hayley S.
    Goeller, Brandon C.
    Hogsden, Kristy L.
    Warburton, Helen J.
    Harding, Jon S.
    McIntosh, Angus R.
    CASE STUDIES IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [46] Dissemination and perception of adaptation co-benefits: Insights from the coastal area of Bangladesh
    Rahman, Syed Mahbubur
    Mori, Akihisa
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 20
  • [47] Co-benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
    Kvamsas, Hanna
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 33 (03) : 232 - 244
  • [48] Beyond cost and carbon: The multidimensional co-benefits of low carbon transitions in Europe
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Martiskainen, Mari
    Hook, Andrew
    Baker, Lucy
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
  • [49] Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippine uplands: implications for forest landscape restoration
    Mukul, Sharif A.
    Herbohn, John
    Firn, Jennifer
    BIOTROPICA, 2016, 48 (06) : 882 - 889
  • [50] Obesity and climate change mitigation in Australia: overview and analysis of policies with co-benefits
    Lowe, Melanie
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 38 (01) : 19 - 24