Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

被引:2
|
作者
Hagger, Valerie [1 ]
Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe [2 ]
Rossini, Renee Anne [1 ]
Adame, Maria Fernanda [3 ]
Glamore, William [4 ]
Lavery, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Waltham, Nathan J. [7 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Atmospher Res Ltd, Natl Inst Water, Dept Marine Ecol, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Ctr Marine & Coastal Res, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Water Res Lab, Manly Vale, NSW, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Marine Ecosyst Res, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MANGROVE; MARSH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse types of saline coastal wetlands contribute significantly to global biodiversity, carbon stocks, and ecosystem functions. Opportunities to incentivise coastal wetland restoration from carbon markets is growing across the world. However, little is known of the economic feasibility of blue carbon restoration across different regions, or the quantities of ecological and social co-benefits that accompany restoration. We explored the opportunities for tidal restoration of coastal wetlands for blue carbon projects in three regions across Australia. We identified biophysically suitable potential restoration sites for mangroves, saltmarshes and supratidal forests, estimated their carbon abatement over 25 years, and undertook a cost-benefit analysis under the carbon market. Potential co-benefits of restoration sites for biodiversity, fisheries, water quality and coastal protection were measured to identify economically feasible sites that maximise the provision of co-benefits. Cultural benefits were identified as the potential for leadership and collaboration by Traditional Custodians at sites. We found that the extent of restoration opportunities varied among regions, with variation in tidal range, extent of agricultural land-use, and the type of hydrological modifications influencing carbon abatement forecasts. The presence of threatened species in hydrologically modified wetlands reduced the amount of land available for restoration, however the restoration of remaining areas could produce rich ecological and cultural benefits. A high carbon price was needed to make blue carbon restoration profitable on land used for beef production. We found sites where carbon credits can be bundled with co-benefits to possibly attain higher carbon prices. Traditional Custodians were interested in leading blue carbon projects, however the opportunity is dependent on Native Title rights. Through comparison of case studies, we developed a regional approach to identify coastal wetland restoration sites for blue carbon and co-benefits that can incorporate local knowledge and data availability, engage with Traditional Custodians, and adapt to the unique characteristics of regions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioeconomic Modelling of Coastal Cod and Kelp Forest Interactions: Co-benefits of Habitat Services, Fisheries and Carbon Sinks
    Godwin K. Vondolia
    Wenting Chen
    Claire W. Armstrong
    Magnus D. Norling
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 75 : 25 - 48
  • [32] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Mathijs J. H. M. Harmsen
    Pim van Dorst
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Maarten van den Berg
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Zbigniew Klimont
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1519 - 1538
  • [33] Mitigation co-benefits of carbon sequestration from MGNREGS in India
    Ravindranath, N. H.
    Murthy, Indu K.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [34] Bioeconomic Modelling of Coastal Cod and Kelp Forest Interactions: Co-benefits of Habitat Services, Fisheries and Carbon Sinks
    Vondolia, Godwin K.
    Chen, Wenting
    Armstrong, Claire W.
    Norling, Magnus D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (01): : 25 - 48
  • [35] Spatial optimization of carbon-stocking projects across Africa integrating stocking potential with co-benefits and feasibility
    Michelle Greve
    Belinda Reyers
    Anne Mette Lykke
    Jens-Christian Svenning
    Nature Communications, 4
  • [36] Blue carbon benefits from global saltmarsh restoration
    Mason, Victoria G.
    Burden, Annette
    Epstein, Graham
    Jupe, Lucy L.
    Wood, Kevin A.
    Skov, Martin W.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (23) : 6517 - 6545
  • [37] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    Zimmer, Martin
    Ahmed, Imran
    Donato, Daniel
    Kanzaki, Mamoru
    Xu, Ming
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [38] Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits
    Kragt, M. E.
    Gibson, F. L.
    Maseyk, F.
    Wilson, K. A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 126 : 125 - 131
  • [39] Low carbon scenarios for transport in India: Co-benefits analysis
    Dhar, Subash
    Shukla, Priyadarshi R.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 81 : 186 - 198
  • [40] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Md Mizanur Rahman
    Martin Zimmer
    Imran Ahmed
    Daniel Donato
    Mamoru Kanzaki
    Ming Xu
    Nature Communications, 12