Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

被引:2
|
作者
Hagger, Valerie [1 ]
Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe [2 ]
Rossini, Renee Anne [1 ]
Adame, Maria Fernanda [3 ]
Glamore, William [4 ]
Lavery, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Waltham, Nathan J. [7 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Atmospher Res Ltd, Natl Inst Water, Dept Marine Ecol, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Ctr Marine & Coastal Res, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Water Res Lab, Manly Vale, NSW, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Marine Ecosyst Res, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MANGROVE; MARSH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse types of saline coastal wetlands contribute significantly to global biodiversity, carbon stocks, and ecosystem functions. Opportunities to incentivise coastal wetland restoration from carbon markets is growing across the world. However, little is known of the economic feasibility of blue carbon restoration across different regions, or the quantities of ecological and social co-benefits that accompany restoration. We explored the opportunities for tidal restoration of coastal wetlands for blue carbon projects in three regions across Australia. We identified biophysically suitable potential restoration sites for mangroves, saltmarshes and supratidal forests, estimated their carbon abatement over 25 years, and undertook a cost-benefit analysis under the carbon market. Potential co-benefits of restoration sites for biodiversity, fisheries, water quality and coastal protection were measured to identify economically feasible sites that maximise the provision of co-benefits. Cultural benefits were identified as the potential for leadership and collaboration by Traditional Custodians at sites. We found that the extent of restoration opportunities varied among regions, with variation in tidal range, extent of agricultural land-use, and the type of hydrological modifications influencing carbon abatement forecasts. The presence of threatened species in hydrologically modified wetlands reduced the amount of land available for restoration, however the restoration of remaining areas could produce rich ecological and cultural benefits. A high carbon price was needed to make blue carbon restoration profitable on land used for beef production. We found sites where carbon credits can be bundled with co-benefits to possibly attain higher carbon prices. Traditional Custodians were interested in leading blue carbon projects, however the opportunity is dependent on Native Title rights. Through comparison of case studies, we developed a regional approach to identify coastal wetland restoration sites for blue carbon and co-benefits that can incorporate local knowledge and data availability, engage with Traditional Custodians, and adapt to the unique characteristics of regions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-benefits of soil carbon protection for invertebrate conservation
    Flores-Rios, Angelli
    Thomas, Evert
    Peri, Pablo P.
    Amelung, Wulf
    Duarte-Guardia, Sandra
    Borchard, Nils
    Lizarraga-Travaglini, Alfonso
    Velez-Azanero, Armando
    Sheil, Douglas
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    Ladd, Brenton
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 252
  • [22] Co-benefits of planting species mixes in carbon projects
    Standish, Rachel J.
    Hulvey, Kristin B.
    ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2014, 15 (01) : 26 - 29
  • [23] Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China
    Li, Mingwei
    Zhang, Da
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Mulvaney, Kathleen M.
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (05) : 398 - +
  • [24] Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia
    Tasya Vadya Sarira
    Yiwen Zeng
    Rachel Neugarten
    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
    Lian Pin Koh
    Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5 : 393 - 396
  • [25] Co-benefits of forest carbon projects in Southeast Asia
    Sarira, Tasya Vadya
    Zeng, Yiwen
    Neugarten, Rachel
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Koh, Lian Pin
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (05) : 393 - 396
  • [26] An opinion on BlueCAM an Australian blue carbon method to estimate climate change mitigation benefits of coastal wetland restoration by Lovelock et al. (2022)
    Gallagher, John Barry
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2023, 31 (08)
  • [27] Opportunities for blue carbon restoration projects in degraded agricultural land of the coastal zone in Queensland, Australia
    Rowland, Phebe I.
    Hagger, Valerie
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Opportunities for blue carbon restoration projects in degraded agricultural land of the coastal zone in Queensland, Australia
    Phebe I. Rowland
    Valerie Hagger
    Catherine E. Lovelock
    Regional Environmental Change, 2023, 23
  • [29] Forest carbon offsets include co-benefits and co-detriments
    Hastings, Sarah
    Laflower, Danelle
    Thompson, Jonathan R.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 143 - 144
  • [30] The truth about co-benefits: a multidimensional feasibility assessment for thailand and beyond
    Zusman, Eric
    Akahoshi, Kaoru
    Hanaoka, Tatsuya
    Malley, Christopher S.
    Wangwongwatana, Supat
    Onmek, Nutthajit
    Paw-armart, Ittipol
    Thi, Kim Oanh Nguyen
    Huy, Lai Nguyen
    Kuylenstierna, Johan C., I
    Hirayama, Tomoki
    Goto, Yurie
    Kazumasa, Kawashima
    Amann, Markus
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    Slater, Jessica
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):